CSFF Blog Tour - The Orphan King by Sigmund Brouwer

Julie for the CSFF Blog Tour!

I'll preface this by saying that now I know how my mom feels when she reads fantasy...you know how some books just don't click with you? Well, now I can see why Mom doesn't "get" the genre, because I had trouble following this one. (Just glancing through the Goodreads reviews tells me I'm not alone, so I feel a little less stupid.) I also got to review these two books while dealing with an apartment flood, so that may not have helped so much.
 

Book: The Orphan King by Sigmund Brouwer

Ridiculously simplified summary: In 1300s England, an orphan is prophesied to take the impenetrable castle of Magnus. With no one but a knight, an eleven-year-old thief, and a mysterious, beautiful woman to aid him, can he succeed in his quest?

Content: Religion is for the most part portrayed negatively, until near the end, and there's still not much of it. Overall light violence (at least two folks get hit in the crotch, and at least one act appears much worse than it turns out to be). But until a turnabout in the end, I didn't notice the protagonist being at all bothered by violence. From the start, I was irritated by the negative portrayal of overweight people (who were historically, and noted in the book itself, considered attractive).

Rating:

Compelling: 4 out of 10. I had a very difficult time discerning the motivations of the main characters. The reason I agreed to review this book was because it was on the blog tour (which is always fun) and the first few lines drew me in:

Amidst the shouting and haggling in the crowded and filthy market square, two women appeared to be examining the quality of spun wool.

Neither was a woman.

And neither cared about the wool.

Most of the rest of the book is nothing like this (in my opinion), focusing on completely different characters and even changing in tone. I've heard authors aren't supposed to use prologues anymore, since many readers skip them...but this is as good a case for a prologue as any, because I would have known what I was in for.

At any rate, I didn't know what was going on, wasn't sure what characters wanted or why they wanted it, and overall just kind of muddled through this one. If I hadn't agreed to review this for the blog tour, I actually would've stopped sometime well before chapter 10.

The author seems to eventually acknowledge that the reader is left with questions--about three-quarters through the book, Thomas ruminates on all the questions that we, as readers, also have. And as the end approaches, some mysteries are resolved in a compelling manner and other mysteries are explained. I thought the book finished much stronger than it started. I don't mind some mysteries--quite a few are present at the end of the book--but I need to have SOME answers, and it took way too long for me to get to any.

Characters: 3 out of 10. Again, I couldn't follow the motivations, which means that I can't follow what characters want or why they want it--and it's difficult to engage with characters who aren't instantly likable or humorous, when you don't know what they want.

Through most of the novel, I actively disliked the protagonist, Thomas. Soon after the book starts, he attacks the (admittedly corrupt) monks for whom he'd been working as a slave, with practically no sympathy for what becomes of any of them. Later on he throws acid in the face of two men (substantially later, it comes out that this acid only causes temporary blindness, not permanent blindness and deformity--but by then his integrity was hopelessly damaged in my mind). I just found him very unlikable, probably due to his initial violence to get his way over a cause that I didn't even believe in. Maybe he is the kind of character that's supposed to start out rough and get better by the end, but I couldn't find much to like until well more than half the book had passed.

Other characters, like the knight William, held things so close to their chests that I had a hard time caring what they were up to, since I didn't understand what they were doing or why they were doing it.

The less-important characters were pleasant enough, with the boy thief and Katherine being likable, if not groundbreaking.

Writing/editing: 6 out of 10. I saw nothing wrong with the writing style itself, aside from some abrupt point of view shifts within scenes (often accepted for fantasy, but something new writers are told to avoid, and not my favorite). But the way the story was revealed (or in many cases not) did not work for me at all. While I enjoyed the idea of how Thomas could win Magnus nearer to the end, I found some of those descriptions muddled and confusing.

Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. I felt like I got a fairly good sense of this medieval world (which was only VERY lightly speculative...almost every speculative element seemed to me to be plant-based). I didn't really get a sense of characters as behaving as if they were people of the day, but maybe that's part of the speculative.

Positive: 3 out of 5. It ended much more positively than it began, though I still have a bad taste in my mouth about the treatment of the overweight and even the disfigured.

Gut reaction: 3 out of 5. I'm glad it got better at the end...from the first half, I was very much dreading reading the second book the publisher generously gave us. (And frankly, I am starting to suspect the publisher purposely provided Book 2--shipped separately nonetheless--specifically because it promises to be a much better read than this book.)

Bonus points: 5 out of 5.

Recommended for: Hardcore fans of medieval stories...through this book, no love of fantasy (or Christian fiction) required, in my opinion.

Total Rating: 2.7 out of 5 stars

*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book from the publisher.

Check out the other participants in the blog tour!


Gillian Adams
Julie Bihn
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Janey DeMeo
Theresa Dunlap
Victor Gentile
Nikole Hahn
Jeremy Harder
Ryan Heart
Janeen Ippolito
Becky Jesse
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Megan @ Hardcover Feedback
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Anna Mittower
Eve Nielsen
Nathan Reimer
James Somers
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler

Review - The Skin Map by Stephen R. Lawhead

Another review from Julie! Borrowed this one free for Kindle from my local library! Oh, and as a note, I read this completely in the wrong order...I started with The Bone House (book 2 in the Bright Empires series), then The Spirit Well (book 3)...and then made my way to Book 1 a couple months later. So my perspective may be a bit odd. And frankly, if you've read those reviews, there's a lot of overlap with this one.
 

Book: The Skin Map by Stephen R. Lawhead

Ridiculously simplified summary: First in a series. Kit, a hapless young man, is dragged into the world of magical ley lines, which take travelers through time and place, and to parallel dimensions. Along the way, Kit's girlfriend is literally lost. Of infinite importance is The Skin Map, a guide to the numerous pathways between worlds...which must not fall into the wrong hands.

Content: Several fights and a few deaths. Nothing that struck me as terribly gruesome, though I'd known what was coming beforehand. Very light talk about God (not so much Christianity).  Maybe the sweetest example:

"To our success!" cried Etzel gladly. "May it please God."

"May it please God," echoed Mina softly, almost to herself. And something in her stirred at the thought.

Rating:

Compelling: 7 out of 10. Like the other books I've read in the series, there are some storylines I loved (I found the book worth reading just for Wilhelmina and Etzel). Others, not so much. Since I knew the ultimate outcome of some of the storylines, they weren't as interesting as they might have been otherwise.

Characters: 7 out of 10. Pretty much exactly like in The Bone House. Lady Fayth was interesting, though if I hadn't read later books I'm not sure I would have liked her. Wilhelmina and Etzel...I thought Etzel did bring up things being God's will and such a bit gratuitously by the end, but I still could just hug him, and it was so much fun to see Mina's progression. Lord Burleigh was nicely scary. As for the main character, Kit, I still found him rather dull.

Writing/editing: 7 out of 10. Overall solid writing and I didn't notice any outright errors. The use of unusual dialogue tags (things like "Kit allowed" instead of "Kit said") was here in full force, which made it especially difficult to read the long conversations. I had a bit of difficulty following the fight scenes, and found some of the descriptions of the foreign places they visit overly long and dull. But then, my main interest is the concept of space/time travel, and seeing how people interact in these worlds...not watching fights and reading descriptions longer than my Kindle screen.

Plausibility/believability: 4 out of 5. Lots of details about each locale (I occasionally found it to be too much). The place Mina ends up, and who rescues her, could arguably be considered too convenient, though I found it more Providential than anything else.

Positive: 3 out of 5. Not really a happy ending in any way, though it's a series, and there's a hint of hope at the end.

Gut reaction: 3 out of 5. I have no idea if I would've maintained interest in the series based on this book. By book 3 I was hooked, though. Reading this one out of order was fun because you could see what was set up here and then explained later. I can't fathom the amount of planning this series must have taken.

Bonus points: 5 out of 5.

Recommended for: Fans of time-travel fiction, not necessarily Christian.

Total Rating: 3.6 out of 5 stars

*I borrowed this book free from my local library.

Random thoughts re: Angel Eyes - CSFF Blog Tour

I mentioned on other blogs that Dittemore is obviously aware of Twilight. Brielle thinks:

...I refuse to join the stalkarazzi as they giggle and bat their eyes, but their worship has me curious.

Did I miss something spectacular about the kid this morning? Does he sparkle in the sunlight? Does he have fangs? What?

On the one hand, that's a pop culture reference, which others on the tour noted, were fairly common in the book. But I think it shows a level of awareness on the part of Dittemore. Which is a good thing--I don't think she copied Twilight, but there are some unmistakable similarities, and I wouldn't be surprised if there was some inspiration from there, intentional or not. (Myself and a few others observed some of them, but Jason Joyner noted the similarities from the point of view of someone who read the series!)

Shannon McDermott always writes better entries than I do and she had a good, fairly brief rundown of angels in the Bible.

And if you didn't see it, Anna Mittower links to a very good interview with the author (and also has a scavenger hunt!). After reading the interview, I can see where Dittemore is definitely suited for the young adult market. (I was shocked to see who the biggest influence in her writing career was!) I'm interested to see what series Dittemore might write in the future.

One parting thought that came to me yesterday. Recently I started watching the show Leverage in syndication. (By "recently," I mean a full 3 days before the season finale aired--I sure can pick them.) The show is basically about a gang of cons and grifters using their deceptive powers for good. It's not uncommon for the gang to perform a good deed, using secret identities, and then vanish suddenly. For instance, in a recent episode, one member posed as an "air marshall" who helped save an innocent woman from certain doom (and then the gang asked her to do a good deed herself that could, in theory, endanger her own safety).

Presumably, if the woman later tried to find that anonymous air marshall, not only could she not track him down, but no one would have any record of him even existing at all.

If Dittemore's speculations are even remotely right--and they're not un-Biblical--then REAL angels could be doing that exact same kind of thing this very moment.

MIND BLOWN.

Thanks for the tour, everyone!

CSFF Blog Tour - Review - Angel Eyes - Shannon Dittemore

Julie here for the CSFF Blog Tour!


So I've probably written more than my fair share of less-than-glowing reviews. When I saw we were doing Angel Eyes by Shannon Dittemore (website, Facebook), I was wary. Angst-filled girl moves from the big city to a small town to live with her father, and then a strangely attractive, apparently supernatural young man shows up at her high school and evidently has a thing for her? OK, granted, I haven't read Twilight but I KNOW Twilight's not my cup of tea and I assumed this wouldn't be either. I didn't request a review copy because I didn't really want a copy of a book I didn't think I'd like and I REALLY didn't want the obligation of reading a book that I thought might be pure torture.

But, my local library had an electronic copy that I could borrow on my Kindle for free. So here I am, writing my review!
 

Book: Angel Eyes by Shannon Dittemore

Ridiculously simplified summary: Guilt-ridden teen Brielle moves back to the small town of Stratus. She meets a mysterious young man named Jake, who speaks of angels. Turns out, there's a whole spirit world Brielle never knew of...and even the physical world around her has more darkness than she could ever have imagined.

Content: Some violence against adults, children, and angels, including murder. The dark twists closer to the end surprised me. I'll speak of angels in "Plausibility/Believability" below. Besides the ending, the only thing that tempted me to throw my Kindle across the room was:

"Lean not on your own understanding." The words are melodic, fortune cookie-ish.

Any protagonist comparing the word of God to a fortune cookie, without instantly being corrected, makes me squirm.

Oh, and let's make it clear. I'm female, but not a teenager. I was never into much of what teen girls were "supposed" to like back in my day (Beverly Hills 90210, Saved by the Bell, New Kids on the Block). As I hinted at, I don't care for Twilight.

In short, I am not the target audience. (IANTTA) But hopefully the rating system will help make things a bit better.

Rating:

Compelling: 6 out of 10. I can't stand when characters spend their time moping and pitying themselves, and at the start, that's Brielle's forte. She spends (literally) the first quarter of the book beating herself up with guilt over some unstated awfulness in her life. And even once we find the source, her guilt didn't feel quite right to me.

MINOR SPOILER:

She's beating herself up over something she couldn't have controlled

That's not necessarily unrealistic, but not something I want to read.

The middle section, where we start to learn about the world of angels and demons, is more interesting, and there are parts I absolutely devoured. The world set up is fascinating, with a lot of potential.

Near the end, though, a bunch more people come in and the situation got very complicated. I found some of the twists unbelievable, while the action ramped up and I couldn't follow all of it. (I have that trouble with quite a few books, though.)

Characters: 5 out of 10. I enjoyed some of the minor characters--Kaylee was entertaining and when we see Ali she was great. The angels were likable, and Jake was interesting enough, even charming at first. Brielle was just hard for me to like, which drove the rating down. Beautiful teen ballerina/photographer...not my kind of character. Her number quirk kind of creeped me out. (IANTTA)

Writing/editing: 7 out of 10. Others will certainly disagree, but I feel Dittemore writes in a rather distanced style, considering it's first-person present tense. (Oh. Yes. Most of the book is first-person present tense, so instead of saying "She walked across the room," it would be "I walk across the room.")

I don't personally feel things along with Brielle, but rather I hear her tell me about them. For instance, pretty much every critiquer advises writers to show, not tell--to avoid saying "It was" etc. (For a poor example, instead of saying "It was cold," say "The chill air raised goosebumps.") There are few "was"es here, because the book is all present tense, but there are tons of "is"es. That said, a reader may not mind that at all...a teen reader almost certainly won't. (IANTTA)

Earlier in the book, some of the phrasings delighted me, though. To describe the condition of a car:

One of the back doors is missing a handle, and the other is red.

It just made me laugh. (Which shows that yes, "is"es can work just fine.) The descriptions of the Celestial world, too, are interesting--I couldn't have come up with them.

I didn't notice any glaring editing issues--aside from the editor letting a couple (teen-friendly?) "Nooooo"s slip through--those read like fanfic to me. I didn't notice any major Kindle formatting glitches.

Plausibility/believability: 2 out of 5. I'm still a bit squeamish about people writing fantasies about rules that angels have (mostly that one angel's only guidance from God is being given clues that he has to decipher). But as I mentioned earlier, I'd say that most of it is more extra-Biblical than anti-Biblical. I don't personally believe real angels are quite like the ones in this book, and I'm not so sure they literally live among us long enough to even raise a child as their own, as Canaan does. And I really have difficulty believing God actually gives angels clues so they can try to do His will--though I can't say that it's completely impossible, and I don't mind the speculation. In short, Dittemore does quite a good job painting the world, with only a few inconsistencies. I enjoyed the angelic aspects on a speculative level, and they made me think about the spiritual level. If plausibility were just limited to the spiritual element, I'd give this at least 4 out of 5.

But what really got me were the problems in the "Terrestrial" world, and specifically, the human trafficking subplot. The way I read it, at least, the captives were primarily white, middle class, and fluent in English. Human trafficking is a terrible thing and I'm not denying it happens in America. But I live in a world where a (white, American) girl who's kidnapped and kept as a slave can make the news years after her rescue, and where I live, the "Fundamentalist" polygamist Mormons in Colorado City make the news with some regularity. I just can't believe that numerous well-connected families' children would be kidnapped and no one even noticed. I'm not sure how it should've been handled, given how distasteful it would be to have the white/middle-class kids save the minority kids. Frankly, I would've personally rather that part of the plot had been more subtle to begin with, as I thought the spiritual element was intense enough without such an extreme ending. By the end, I didn't feel like I was reading the same book I'd been set up for. But hey, (IANTTA).

(If I am wrong about exactly who is trafficked in America, I'd like to know. But I looked both on Dittemore's blog/website and chabdai.org, the site listed at the end of the novel, and could not find anything about human trafficking of multiple, English-speaking, white Americans.)

Positive: 4 out of 5 (maybe). While some rather shocking things happen, God has His purposes and will work all things out to good. Except...

Gut reaction: 2 out of 5. ...I guess a trend of YA novels is to have a nice happy ending, and then in the last few pages, throw a huge wrench in it to try to make you read the next book? It happened in The Hunger Games and it happened here. Frankly, that infuriates me. If you want to hook the reader, throw a few paragraphs or even a chapter from the sequel in at the end. But I think a book should stand on its own. Having something random go wrong to entice the reader to keep reading makes me not want to read, and makes me less interested in reading the rest of the series.

I also found it disturbing that multiple villains are described as having "dark hair, dark eyes, olive complexion." Granted, there are a lot of villains, but it just rubbed me the wrong way.

Bonus points: 5 out of 5.

Recommended for: I think this would be an excellent book for fans of "angel" books. It gives an actual Christian point of view--I don't agree with every bit, but it's a far sight better than many portrayals.

It might help if you are a teenage girl, though!

Total Rating: 3.1 out of 5 stars

Here are the other tour participants!

Late entry - April Erwin

Gillian Adams
Julie Bihn
Beckie Burnham
Theresa Dunlap
Nikole Hahn
Jeremy Harder
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Anna Mittower
Faye Oygard
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jessica Thomas
Rachel Starr Thomson
Steve Trower
Dona Watson
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler

*I downloaded this book free from my local library.

Fear and Angel Eyes by Shannon Dittemore - CSFF Blog Tour

Julie here for the CSFF Blog Tour! This month the book is Angel Eyes by Shannon Dittemore (website, Facebook).  

Angel Eyes is about two teens' journey through the world of something most people never see: angels and demons.

In Dittemore's view, it seems that most of all, demons love fear. Here is how an angel sees fear:

She's on the phone, her back stiff, the black tar of fear soaking through her shirt and pouring thickly onto the floor. A fog rises like steam from the muck and settles heavily around them. From under her blond hair, the clingy substance oozes, running the length of her body. Her hands shake, desperate to be rid of it...

If human beings could only see the manifestation of such a weapon, they would understand how it paralyzes, literally holding them captive with the glue of it.

And later, from a demon's point of view:

...but Damien finds little delight in the pain he's inflicted.

Pain is not nearly as satisfying as fear.

I thought the description of fear was interesting (and often disgusting). I think it's a good lesson for us to think about--especially for a book directed toward teen girls, who, I think even more than most people, tend to be terrified of what others will think. I know I still struggle with fear of putting myself out there, even though Jesus gives us freedom from fear. (and even though I'm far from a teenager)

That said, I wonder...is it Biblically accurate, that demons love fear even more than pain? When their mission (even in the book) is to steal, kill, and destroy?

Of course, the Bible repeatedly instructs us to "fear God."

 “I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him. Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God. Indeed, the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Don’t be afraid; you are worth more than many sparrows.  --Luke 12:4-7 (NIV 1984)

Getting into the actual meaning of "fearing God," contrasted with the Biblical commands to "not fear," is outside the scope of my discussion here. OK, mostly I'm not knowledgeable enough to get into it, though if you have any thoughts, I'd be interested to hear.

On the other side of fear, even ignoring the fear the Israelites' enemies certainly would have felt, just looking up the word "fear" comes up with a lot of instances of fear that doesn't seem to be against God's will. For instance, people fear the Jews (Deuteronomy 11:25; Esther 8:17) , and God Himself threatens or promises to punish Israel by what they fear, if they're unfaithful (Ezekiel 11:8; Leviticus 26:36). In the New Testament, even Jesus calming the storms made his disciples afraid (Luke 8:25). I don't like to think that after Jesus performed an amazing miracle, his disciples were covered in the sticky black tar of fear, demons looking on in glee.

Anyway, I wouldn't say the "fear" imagery is anti-Biblical, per se, though I'm not convinced in the world outside of the book, "fear" is always a bad thing. I see the book as more extra-Biblical, speculating about how things could be, more than reflecting about how things certainly are.

But it mostly felt plausible to me, unlike some other angel books I've read. I don't know that I completely agree with the portrayal, but I was willing to follow along anyway, as a "well, maybe it could happen this way." From the little I've seen of angel books, I think Angel Eyes is a rarity in that regard, since so many other books get it so distinctly wrong.

Here are the other tour participants!

Late entry - April Erwin

Gillian Adams
Julie Bihn
Beckie Burnham
Theresa Dunlap
Nikole Hahn
Jeremy Harder
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Anna Mittower
Faye Oygard
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jessica Thomas
Rachel Starr Thomson
Steve Trower
Dona Watson
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler

Review - Heartless (Tales of Goldstone Wood Book #1) Anne Elisabeth Stengl

Another review from Julie!

So this one's a bit unusual. I was hoping to participate in the CSFF Blog Tour for Anne Elisabeth Stengl's Starflower, but a glitch kept me from getting a copy. I did read Heartless (free on Kindle) and Rebecca Luella Miller generously gave me a copy of Starflower to review, so it is on my list. (If you want to read about Starflower, though, head over to the CSFF blog tour!)
 

Book: Heartless (Tales of Goldstone Wood Book #1) by Anne Elisabeth Stengl

Ridiculously simplified summary: In this highly allegorical tale, Princess Una has many suitors, but dismisses the Faerie Prince Aethelbald as dull. She'd rather be swept off her feet by someone more interesting and charming. When she ignores the prince's urgent warnings, her kingdom is torn apart by a dragon...

Content: The violence didn't upset me, and no sexual content that I recall (just some light romance).

I can't see how to review this book without taking the heavy Christian content into the review itself. The whole story is very clearly allegorical, with Aethelbald loving the unlovable princess, willing to sacrifice himself for her, etc. To me, a good allegory should stand on its own--that is, the character's actions should make sense even if you don't know the source material. Here, I thought the allegory overpowered the characters' story, rendering the two main characters rather lifeless.

Rating:

Compelling: 6 out of 10. While Felix seemed interesting, I got rather bored with all of Una's courting. Approximately midway through the book, the story got much more interesting. I started getting lost in the end, but I find that to be the case for me with many fantasy (and other) books.

Characters: 4 out of 10. Some characters were fairly charming (like Felix--although this deleted scene from a later book made me dislike him). Some characters were at least interesting and entertaining, if not entirely sympathetic (like Leonard). Monster the cat was adorable.

I realize that allegorically, Una was supposed to be unlikable, but it was hard for me to read about a foolish, selfish character. She finally got some spirit about midway through the book and I started to like her more, but I felt like she was lifeless at the end, almost slavishly devoted, but without the passion I'm used to seeing in romance novels.

At first I really liked Aethelbald. Una derided him as "boring," despite the fact that is the Prince of the fairies, and came with a whole group of magical people at the beginning of the book. Instinctively, I rankled against her assessment of him, and decided he wasn't boring at all, particularly given the patience he had with Felix (in short, the unfortunately-named Aethelbald was cool). Note to authors, if you want me to like a character, tell me how bad they are. But as the book progressed, I started to see why Una found him boring! His initial passion toward Una, abruptly asking for her hand in marriage, was endearing, but I feel like that passion dwindled toward the end.

I don't know for certain if the other books in the series address some of the other characters brought up in this book, but for me, some of the more interesting characters' storylines just fade away.

Writing/editing: 8 out of 10. There are some fun turns of phrases here, such as:

With that, she turned on her heel and marched down the corridor, the blind cat trotting behind, unlike a dog in every way because, of course, he wasn't truly following her. He merely happened to be going her way.

The free Kindle edition had some obnoxious formatting issues on my Kindle Keyboard.  Probably at least once a chapter, two words either run together, or appear to run together, which got distracting. Advancing to the next page, then going back, seems to fix it in some cases, though I believe there are a few instances where the words are run together, and one spot that's unreadable. (Not helping is the fact that when she's extremely flustered, Una speaks in nonsense! Which got funnier later, but I read it as a ridiculously grievous typo at first.)

It appears the publisher forced the book to be a certain font, so that could have something to do with the actual glitches.

I'm assuming the later books don't have this trait, but at least a couple bits come straight from Narnia. (Though I'm glad she's evidently read those books!) The main borrowing is a major plot point, but there is another point where Aethelbald is leading some doubters and they think he's disappeared over the edge of a gorge, but are commanded to follow, only to find that he's in fact on a path. To me that felt more like lifting directly from Aslan in Prince Caspian, more than an homage.

Plausibility/believability: 2 out of 5. I feel like I didn't get as rich a sense of Stengl's world as she has in her head. I believe this is a debut novel, with many more set in the same world, so that may very well be fixed in later books. To me, I felt like the allegory made the character motivations a bit more strained--I figured they were acting that way because that's how Jesus/the church act in the Bible. (Except I think Jesus generally demonstrates a lot more passion, instead of being meek to the point of moping.)

Positive: 2 out of 5. There's just a whole lot of destruction later in this book. But what upset me most was the repercussions of the allegory. I couldn't ignore the idea that Aethelbald was the Christ figure, yet he loves and is hoping to marry just one of his followers, even though he asks others to follow him. That would give the follower he marries a closeness that no other follower could hope to possibly attain. In fact, Aethelbald seems to divide his time between two realms, but from what we see, he doesn't seem too upset if the rest of the human world burns, so long as he can save Una and her family. Is that the point? And is it true that Jesus doesn't care so much what happens to anyone but a small group?

In fairness, as an allegory it does show that while we were yet sinners, Christ loved us. I just would've preferred if the allegory were less pronounced.

Gut reaction: 1 out of 5.

Bonus points: 5 out of 5.

Recommended for: Fans of fantasy and Christian allegory; people who value plot over characterization.

Total Rating: 2.8 out of 5 stars

*I downloaded this book free on Amazon.

Two Tickets to the Christmas Ball by Donita K. Paul

Another review from Julie! So I have (or at least had) this uncanny knack of winning prizes in Internet contests, especially when it comes to books. I won a copy of Two Tickets to the Christmas Ball by Donita K. Paul (perhaps better known for her DragonKeeper series).

Oh, and at this moment (December 29, 2012) the book is listed at 99 cents at Christianbook.com!

Book (or Novella): Two Tickets to the Christmas Ball by Donita K. Paul

Ridiculously simplified summary: A practical office worker and her boss' boss both get magical tickets to a Wizard's Ball. Is God drawing them together?

Content: Heavily Christian, but with a bit of speculative/fairytale content. No sex or violence (in fact, male lead Simon is conservative enough to raise my eyebrows a few times).

I enjoyed the speculative content, but folks who are offended by Harry Potter being a wizard--very few of whom are probably reading this blog--should probably avoid this book. Paul again makes a point of so-called "wizards" not actually being the sorcerers spoken of in the Bible. Some of the more magical characters note that if faeries exist, then they came to Bethlehem to see baby Jesus, and says that some people have deathbed conversions that we don't see. I do believe God can do anything, but some of the items brought over as fact don't feel completely like good theology to me. (And there is a substantial amount of Christian discussion, though I'm not sure how necessary most of it is to the book.)

Rating:

Compelling: 8 out of 10. The magical parts of the world are really what drew me in. The main characters spend a fair amount of time along the shops of old-fashioned Sage Street, which doesn't seem to always be there. The shops, and their patrons, were fantastical and compelling, all just on the edge of being impossible. A realist could probably see everything as technically being possible in the real world, though magic is by far the most likely option (and as much as stated closer to the end). To me, Sage Street felt like a cross between Disney and Diagon Alley in Harry Potter.

Characters: 7 out of 10. Cora and Simon, the leads, are rather ordinary, practical people, and they came to life for me at the beginning as strikingly realistic. Simon seemed charming, and I could totally believe Cora as a character. Cora's relentless planning for Christmas gifts was adorable. When it came down to the nuts and bolts of falling in love and such, I don't know what happened, but I found them somehow a bit less interesting, I guess because they had relatively restrained passion. I don't read contemporary romance, though; I prefer historical, and preferably suspenseful, stories. Simon's sister Sandy was a dear; the shopkeepers in Sage Street were entertaining. None of the other characters stood out for me. Cora's sister was almost unbelievably wicked (I know real people like that do exist, granted, but she surprised me in this story).

Writing/editing: 8 out of 10. I didn't notice any typos or anything of the like. The descriptions of fantastical places were fun and to me, the writing never got in the way of the story. To me, that's a compliment.

Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. I got a great sense of Sage Street but a just OK sense of the office. A woman dating her boss' boss...I feel like Cora would have to quit her job, but that was just glossed over. A lot of the Christian talk felt either over-the-top to me, or else shoehorned in, though that's a challenge for romances where both characters are already Christians. And some of the morality surprised me...Simon doesn't watch television, for instance, presumably because of the lax morals.  That's not impossible by any means, but I'd say it puts him in the outside 0.01% of 30-somethings.

Positive: 4 out of 5. I enjoyed the beginning especially, and the climactic resolution at the ending was sweet.

Gut reaction: 3 out of 5. A sweet read, though I felt some loose ends were left untied (Cora's sister, for instance). Perhaps intentionally, or perhaps to leave the reader "wanting more."

Bonus points: 5 out of 5.

Recommended for: Fans of Christian romance with a bit of fantasy.

Not a good fit for: Christians who are wary of anything containing the word "wizard"

Total Rating: 3.8 out of 5 stars

*I received this book free in a giveaway