This is Julie with the CSFF Blog tour!
Book: The First Principle by Marissa Shrock
Ridiculously simplified summary:
The United States has collapsed into a totalitarian empire where minors receive mandatory birth control and, should that fail, abortions. When the district governor's daughter finds herself unexpectedly pregnant, she must choose between submitting to the termination of the pregnancy, or going underground with the people who would fight to remake the government...
Content: Very Evangelical, with several "conversion talks." Several violent deaths, not described in extreme detail. The lead character is a 15-year-old or 16-year-old (depending on if you believe Amazon's description or Rebecca LuElla Miller's correction below) who had sex outside of marriage and who gets pregnant. There's talk of abortion, a procedure which all "respectable" people in the society consider appropriate.
Rating:
Characters - 6 out of 10. Vivica, the main character, was interesting enough--shockingly capable of getting herself out of messy situations and gifted at computer hacking. It's first-person but her emotions aren't made manifest in the writing, and I still don't understand her motivations. I found Ben, the object of her affections, to be rather boring and not particularly likable, while Drake (the final player in a semi-love-triangle) was infuriatingly charming and compelling. Most of the villains were painted with broad strokes, but Vivica's mother, the governor, was somewhat more nuanced. I think the portrayals were appropriate for the genre, but I was hoping for something that might work better for older readers, too.
(It was another novel where all the women of consequence are mothers and/or pregnant; those who aren't, are not portrayed in a positive light. I don't think that's terribly uncommon for Christian novels at this point.)
Suspense/stakes - 5 out of 5. I read this over a weekend, rather unusual for me. Finding out about the underground was interesting and seeing how Vivica will get out of her next jam kept the pages turning for me.
World building - 4 out of 5. The world felt fairly detailed to me, with explanations of how the totalitarian government had developed, slang terms for their equivalent of cell phones, and so forth. Some of the details in the government seem scarily plausible. That said, I would have liked to "see" the physical places more clearly.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. I thought the writing was fine and didn't notice any typographical errors. My main issue was that I felt incredibly distanced from Vivica's feelings and pain. There's some emotional angst, but even when she gets slapped at one point, she (tells us she) literally doesn't feel it when it happens. I tend to write less emotionally myself, but when the subject matter is a character deciding to turn her back on her entire world because there's a baby growing inside her, I expected her to have more emotions. I'd expected her, for instance, to have some kind of turning point when she felt the baby inside her, perhaps, but I saw nothing of the sort. Maybe that's an intentional technique, though.
Clarity - 4 out of 5. Overall I had no trouble following the action. There were a couple chase scenes where I got a bit lost because the scenery wasn't described in detail so I couldn't follow where they were going.
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. This is kind of tricky for me. The explanations for how Christianity became illegal struck me as scary-plausible, to the point that I'm wondering if I should start learning more about hacking (although I feel like making the fake identities needed in dystopian worlds might be more fantasy than anything else). But I didn't personally "believe" Vivica's transformation or her progression towards Christianity. In today's political climate, I really wanted to read a compelling account of why a girl decided against abortion when the government mandated it, but she only rarely showed compassion for her unborn child, never seemed to really think of it as a human (referring to it as a "baby" but not anything about its potential). Her decision seemed to me to be initiated mostly from the fact that the boy she has a crush on begs her not to kill "his" baby, despite the fact that he has no ability (and to me, no interest) in actually supporting the baby once it's born. Arguing that a baby has a right to life because the father wants the baby to live, isn't exactly going to appeal to people who consider it a woman's decision. Frankly, I think the baby has an inherent right to life, but when a deadbeat father is making the argument, that really rankles me.
(I could be wrong, but it also seems to me like ALL of the rebels are Christians, which is good for Christians but I'm not sure if it's realistic...I feel like if freedoms were stripped away like this, it might not be just Christians fighting. Even the very secular The Handmaid's Tale acknowledged that in a world where freedoms are stripped in the name of some twisted version of Christianity, people who want to read the actual Bible will be persecuted, but it seems like some Christian books don't acknowledge the strange bedfellows we just might end up with in bad times...)
Positive - 4 out of 5. The ending is positive enough, though there's a lot of darkness to get there. While the main character turns to Christianity, she doesn't seem to focus on the hope it gives for the people she lost along the way...it was just kind of disconnected to me.
Gut reaction - 3 out of 5. Exciting story that I personally think could have benefited from a dose of emotion, particularly given the subject matter.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Teen girls who are fans of dystopian fiction.
Total Rating: 3.8 out of 5 stars
Click below to see what other tour members think!
Thomas Clayton Booher
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
April Erwin
Carol Gehringer
Victor Gentile
Carol Keen
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Megan @ Hardcover Feedback
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Chawna Schroeder
Jessica Thomas
Shane Werlinger
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I was sent a free copy of this book.
navigation
Showing posts with label Julie's Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Julie's Reviews. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Review - Storm Siren by Mary Weber - CSFF Blog Tour
This is Julie with the CSFF Blog tour!
Book: Storm Siren by Mary Weber (Facebook)
Ridiculously simplified summary:
Nym, a 17-year-old girl with Elemental control over weather, is made slave to a depraved aristocrat. Nym must try to control her powers, overcome her past failings, and save a kingdom that kills Elemental boys at birth.
Content: This is a dark world, and I think the content might be too much for some readers (or parents!). There are countless deaths (many, though not all, a result of war), with horrific treatment of a young child, apparent abuse of a disabled character later on, and other horrors and threats of horrors.
The main character has been a slave most of her life and struggles with cutting/self-harm. At the start, she takes comfort in cutting herself, and the immediacy of the viewpoint made me as a reader almost think her actions made sense. While she works to overcome that self-destructive habit, parents may want to know that the attractive tattoo-like marks on the character's arm on the cover are in fact Nym's scars from cutting.
The 17-year-old main/point-of-view character spends quite a bit of time detailing her longing/lust for a man who struck me as being substantially older, though I believe it's actually a 5-year difference. Her thoughts about doing things like "drinking him in as fast as (she) can" were more sensual than I'd expected to read.
I don't recall any actual cursing, but there is lots of made-up cursing that sometimes sounds like real curses. Notably, the word "hulls" is used more than 30 times as a pretty obvious substitution, as in "What in hulls?" "Oh hulls," and "The world is going to hulls."
I see from other reviews online that some people have said this wasn't intended to be a Christian book. I'd say the Christian content is present but understated. I didn't notice any of it until Chapter 22, more than halfway through. I basically saw mentions of a creator and being created for a purpose, a little talk about good and evil, and an act of self-sacrificing love. CSFF Blog Tour members usually tease out more Christian meaning than I do, though as of about 8 PM PST Monday, I didn't see anyone mentioning anything I haven't.
Rating: (Due to circumstances beyond my control, I read the Kindle copy, not the printed one, but the formatting was fine and I don't think that will affect the rating.)
Characters - 6 out of 10. Due to Nym's close first-person narrative, she was an interesting enough character to follow, though more than once I wished I could have seen parts of the story through someone else's eyes. The heroes seemed fairly realistic to me, which isn't really what I like, because with the single exception of Nym's fellow-elemental/friend Colin, I didn't find any of the characters particularly likable. The heroes are imperfect and for the most part don't seem particularly noble, and the villains are completely wicked to the point that their actions often seemed insane to me.
Perhaps hardest for me was that I didn't care at all for the man Nym completely falls in love with, which made it hard for me to sympathize with her irrational choices involving him. (That said, I am unusually unemotional, so I'm sure others with stronger passions or who liked the man would sympathize more.) Other than a cast of maybe 5 main characters, I thought the others were rather thinly drawn, though that will probably be remedied in the sequel.
Bonus points because I did like Colin and several of the characters felt realistic...and it did hurt some when harm befell a few characters. One more special point for Breck, a blind servant, not acting particularly nice or kind. (Most people with disabilities in books, particularly blind women, seem to lapse into stereotypes of being perfect people aside from one disability.)
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. At first, the immediacy of Nym's narration kept me reading. Later, one character notes, "I'm pretty sure the world's not worth being saved...But I love a good challenge." That actually kind of sums up my feelings. I don't like this world and don't really care for most of the characters, so I slowed down reading near the middle. When I picked it up again, with the building stakes and the immediate style, I was still interested to know what happened next.
World building - 3 out of 5. I appreciate how Weber puts us into the middle of a new world. Some negative reviews I read complained that the world building was weak, and I agree that a lot of things weren't spelled out, but I felt that was mostly a style choice, keeping in the immediacy of Nym's mind. I didn't get the impression that the world wasn't properly built--more like explanation was held back--but I could have benefited from a bit more detail and explanation. There were some interesting touches, like the almost steampunk nature of the warring kingdom Bron.
Writing/editing - 5 out of 5. This is in first-person present, which might turn off some readers. I thought it overall worked, well enough that I started wondering if that's what I should do for my own work in progress. Nym has a strong voice, and I liked some of the flowery descriptions she put in there, as well as some of the humorous, cynical lines, especially about the bizarre parties thrown by her sadistic master. The only quibble I had with the actual writing was Weber's style choice to make Nym use sentence fragments repeatedly. We're in her head, and even third-person narrators in close third-person are using sentence fragments nowadays, but the sheer number of fragments distracted me a bit.
I thought Nym was sometimes distanced from her own pain, even reading as a bit cold as she's suffering massive physical pain...that's how I tend to write, so I assumed Weber was a personality type kind of like mine and it spilled over onto Nym. But reading Weber's gushy acknowledgements at the end revealed that no, while Nym and Weber have the same knack for fancy language, their minds look to be in rather different places, so any distance was surely intentional. In light of that, I'm rather impressed by how Weber rendered Nym's voice, since it's got some differences from her own.
Clarity - 2 out of 5. With all the twists and turns and betrayals and secrets, I got rather lost at the end. A lot of that could have just been bad timing on how I paused a week or so between the first half and the last half. An important character was referenced a fair amount in the first 20 chapters, then once in chapter 23 in passing, and then all over chapters 30-36 (the end). If I'd read straight through, I might not have stumbled. Other points--particularly that Colin is bald and Eogan has black/dark skin--are repeated so often it was annoying, though I know from critique groups that if a character has dark skin, you have to reference it repeatedly or readers will miss it... It's a tricky road to walk, how to be clear enough without being repetitive, and I get the feeling that the second book in the series will handle it better.
Plausibility/believability - 2 out of 5. I felt like some of the characters behaved unexplainably, especially when a bit of critical thinking or even talking with someone they cared about would have probably revealed a certain problem rather early, before it all came to a head to cause major problems for our characters in the climax. Unfortunately, the characters' outright ignoring what struck me as an obvious peculiarity/problem hindered my enjoyment of the rest of the book. I also had a hard time with Nym's insistence on showing mercy to one villain, even while the rest of that villain's men were left to die. Christian forgiveness and/or forgiveness prompted by the Holy Spirit is one thing, but Nym doesn't seem prompted by anything I could wrap my head around. (Although, now I can see why my writing partner gets irritated when my characters want to go too soft on some bad guys!)
Positive - 1 out of 5. Anyone who's read my reviews at all should know I like happy endings. The world here is overall dark; even a third of the way through, I found myself frustrated that there was nothing much to like about the world. Yes, Nym starts to get over some of the darkness inside her, but even as she starts to reach towards the light, her world turns so much darker. I saw no mention of heaven or any eternal hope, just love that's in this world, which left me with kind of a hopeless feeling more than anything.
If you've read my other reviews, you may know that I can't stand endings where everything turns horrible at the VERY end, to compel readers to eagerly anticipate the next book, and this is quite a cliffhanger. The more I look into the ending, the more I see that everything might not be completely lost, particularly if you believe believe that one character really does have prophetic powers...but I think one could make a good argument that the ending of the first book in the Hunger Games trilogy is more optimistic than this ending.
Gut reaction - 2 out of 5. A well-written book that's not written for me.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Older young adults (or regular adults) who like fantasy but don't need/want happy endings...? From the reviews I saw online, there are many, many people who adored this book, so there's obviously something to like. But aside from the strong writing and excellent imagery, the immediacy of Nym's point of view, and the suspense nearer to the end, I can't really figure out the appeal. If you like your fantasy on the dark side, this might be a great read for you.
Total Rating: 2.9 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour, who surely have different opinions than me!
Lauren Bombardier
Beckie Burnham
Vicky DealSharingAunt
George Duncan
April Erwin
Carol Gehringer
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Simone Lilly-Egerter
Jennette Mbewe
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Audrey Sauble
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Michelle R. Wood
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I was sent a free copy of this book.
Book: Storm Siren by Mary Weber (Facebook)
Ridiculously simplified summary:
Nym, a 17-year-old girl with Elemental control over weather, is made slave to a depraved aristocrat. Nym must try to control her powers, overcome her past failings, and save a kingdom that kills Elemental boys at birth.
Content: This is a dark world, and I think the content might be too much for some readers (or parents!). There are countless deaths (many, though not all, a result of war), with horrific treatment of a young child, apparent abuse of a disabled character later on, and other horrors and threats of horrors.
The main character has been a slave most of her life and struggles with cutting/self-harm. At the start, she takes comfort in cutting herself, and the immediacy of the viewpoint made me as a reader almost think her actions made sense. While she works to overcome that self-destructive habit, parents may want to know that the attractive tattoo-like marks on the character's arm on the cover are in fact Nym's scars from cutting.
The 17-year-old main/point-of-view character spends quite a bit of time detailing her longing/lust for a man who struck me as being substantially older, though I believe it's actually a 5-year difference. Her thoughts about doing things like "drinking him in as fast as (she) can" were more sensual than I'd expected to read.
I don't recall any actual cursing, but there is lots of made-up cursing that sometimes sounds like real curses. Notably, the word "hulls" is used more than 30 times as a pretty obvious substitution, as in "What in hulls?" "Oh hulls," and "The world is going to hulls."
I see from other reviews online that some people have said this wasn't intended to be a Christian book. I'd say the Christian content is present but understated. I didn't notice any of it until Chapter 22, more than halfway through. I basically saw mentions of a creator and being created for a purpose, a little talk about good and evil, and an act of self-sacrificing love. CSFF Blog Tour members usually tease out more Christian meaning than I do, though as of about 8 PM PST Monday, I didn't see anyone mentioning anything I haven't.
Rating: (Due to circumstances beyond my control, I read the Kindle copy, not the printed one, but the formatting was fine and I don't think that will affect the rating.)
Characters - 6 out of 10. Due to Nym's close first-person narrative, she was an interesting enough character to follow, though more than once I wished I could have seen parts of the story through someone else's eyes. The heroes seemed fairly realistic to me, which isn't really what I like, because with the single exception of Nym's fellow-elemental/friend Colin, I didn't find any of the characters particularly likable. The heroes are imperfect and for the most part don't seem particularly noble, and the villains are completely wicked to the point that their actions often seemed insane to me.
Perhaps hardest for me was that I didn't care at all for the man Nym completely falls in love with, which made it hard for me to sympathize with her irrational choices involving him. (That said, I am unusually unemotional, so I'm sure others with stronger passions or who liked the man would sympathize more.) Other than a cast of maybe 5 main characters, I thought the others were rather thinly drawn, though that will probably be remedied in the sequel.
Bonus points because I did like Colin and several of the characters felt realistic...and it did hurt some when harm befell a few characters. One more special point for Breck, a blind servant, not acting particularly nice or kind. (Most people with disabilities in books, particularly blind women, seem to lapse into stereotypes of being perfect people aside from one disability.)
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. At first, the immediacy of Nym's narration kept me reading. Later, one character notes, "I'm pretty sure the world's not worth being saved...But I love a good challenge." That actually kind of sums up my feelings. I don't like this world and don't really care for most of the characters, so I slowed down reading near the middle. When I picked it up again, with the building stakes and the immediate style, I was still interested to know what happened next.
World building - 3 out of 5. I appreciate how Weber puts us into the middle of a new world. Some negative reviews I read complained that the world building was weak, and I agree that a lot of things weren't spelled out, but I felt that was mostly a style choice, keeping in the immediacy of Nym's mind. I didn't get the impression that the world wasn't properly built--more like explanation was held back--but I could have benefited from a bit more detail and explanation. There were some interesting touches, like the almost steampunk nature of the warring kingdom Bron.
Writing/editing - 5 out of 5. This is in first-person present, which might turn off some readers. I thought it overall worked, well enough that I started wondering if that's what I should do for my own work in progress. Nym has a strong voice, and I liked some of the flowery descriptions she put in there, as well as some of the humorous, cynical lines, especially about the bizarre parties thrown by her sadistic master. The only quibble I had with the actual writing was Weber's style choice to make Nym use sentence fragments repeatedly. We're in her head, and even third-person narrators in close third-person are using sentence fragments nowadays, but the sheer number of fragments distracted me a bit.
I thought Nym was sometimes distanced from her own pain, even reading as a bit cold as she's suffering massive physical pain...that's how I tend to write, so I assumed Weber was a personality type kind of like mine and it spilled over onto Nym. But reading Weber's gushy acknowledgements at the end revealed that no, while Nym and Weber have the same knack for fancy language, their minds look to be in rather different places, so any distance was surely intentional. In light of that, I'm rather impressed by how Weber rendered Nym's voice, since it's got some differences from her own.
Clarity - 2 out of 5. With all the twists and turns and betrayals and secrets, I got rather lost at the end. A lot of that could have just been bad timing on how I paused a week or so between the first half and the last half. An important character was referenced a fair amount in the first 20 chapters, then once in chapter 23 in passing, and then all over chapters 30-36 (the end). If I'd read straight through, I might not have stumbled. Other points--particularly that Colin is bald and Eogan has black/dark skin--are repeated so often it was annoying, though I know from critique groups that if a character has dark skin, you have to reference it repeatedly or readers will miss it... It's a tricky road to walk, how to be clear enough without being repetitive, and I get the feeling that the second book in the series will handle it better.
Plausibility/believability - 2 out of 5. I felt like some of the characters behaved unexplainably, especially when a bit of critical thinking or even talking with someone they cared about would have probably revealed a certain problem rather early, before it all came to a head to cause major problems for our characters in the climax. Unfortunately, the characters' outright ignoring what struck me as an obvious peculiarity/problem hindered my enjoyment of the rest of the book. I also had a hard time with Nym's insistence on showing mercy to one villain, even while the rest of that villain's men were left to die. Christian forgiveness and/or forgiveness prompted by the Holy Spirit is one thing, but Nym doesn't seem prompted by anything I could wrap my head around. (Although, now I can see why my writing partner gets irritated when my characters want to go too soft on some bad guys!)
Positive - 1 out of 5. Anyone who's read my reviews at all should know I like happy endings. The world here is overall dark; even a third of the way through, I found myself frustrated that there was nothing much to like about the world. Yes, Nym starts to get over some of the darkness inside her, but even as she starts to reach towards the light, her world turns so much darker. I saw no mention of heaven or any eternal hope, just love that's in this world, which left me with kind of a hopeless feeling more than anything.
If you've read my other reviews, you may know that I can't stand endings where everything turns horrible at the VERY end, to compel readers to eagerly anticipate the next book, and this is quite a cliffhanger. The more I look into the ending, the more I see that everything might not be completely lost, particularly if you believe believe that one character really does have prophetic powers...but I think one could make a good argument that the ending of the first book in the Hunger Games trilogy is more optimistic than this ending.
Gut reaction - 2 out of 5. A well-written book that's not written for me.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Older young adults (or regular adults) who like fantasy but don't need/want happy endings...? From the reviews I saw online, there are many, many people who adored this book, so there's obviously something to like. But aside from the strong writing and excellent imagery, the immediacy of Nym's point of view, and the suspense nearer to the end, I can't really figure out the appeal. If you like your fantasy on the dark side, this might be a great read for you.
Total Rating: 2.9 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour, who surely have different opinions than me!
Lauren Bombardier
Beckie Burnham
Vicky DealSharingAunt
George Duncan
April Erwin
Carol Gehringer
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Simone Lilly-Egerter
Jennette Mbewe
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Audrey Sauble
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Michelle R. Wood
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I was sent a free copy of this book.
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
In Which I Review a Novel - The Fatal Tree by Stephen R. Lawhead - CSFF Blog Tour
This is Julie with the CSFF Blog tour! This month's book is The Fatal Tree by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook), the final book in the epic Bright Empires Series.
Book: The Fatal Tree by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook)
Ridiculously simplified summary:
In the concluding book of the Bright Empires series, our world--and all worlds--are spinning into chaos, with strange, unexplainable events and anomalies as the universe undoes itself. Kit, Mina, Cass and the other ley-travelers must travel through different times and universes to try to fix all timelines. Can they prevent the collapse of time and space?
Content: This was overflowing with Christian content, with inspiring acts of forgiveness, redemption, and even a vision of God. (I still have some problems with the concept that humans could take actions that would cause everything God created to have never existed...but since--spoiler alert!--the multiple array of universes in existence are not destroyed--one could argue that humans can't destroy everything God ever created because God would put in place the people who could prevent it.)
There is a bit of cursing that surprised me--I can't say it was unwarranted, but it surprised me.
Rating:
Characters - 7 out of 10. Like many series, mostly the same characters inhabit this final book, without many additions. A fairly large number of scientists came along; they blurred together for me. One character has a very drastic change, which I thought worked well. Most of the others were more or less steady. Lady Haven and Mina, the most strong-willed female characters here, had quite a few similarities, but since I like that kind of woman, it didn't bother me. Characterization wasn't really the focus here, but I had no real problems. If you read the earlier books and liked the characters there, you'll probably like them here.
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. I'll talk more about this Wednesday and this ties into plausibility, but to me, I thought the stakes were too high, if that's a thing. I just could not believe that the entire world--all worlds--would not only be destroyed, but would be completely undone, so that they never existed. Theology aside, the stakes are so high that you know full well that the worst really can't actually happen.
To balance this, Lawhead occasionally put beloved characters into peril, which was more exciting, because there's certainly no guarantee that any lead character will survive these newly unstable worlds. And speaking of instability, Lawhead did a very good job of showing the effects of our world falling apart...the thought of a bridge simply vanishing while people are driving across it scares me more than the thought of all of God's creation being undone, because it just feels more plausible.
World building - 5 out of 5. The entire series shows a high level of detail and realism. I'm continually impressed by the way Lawhead integrates so many different historical and historically-inspired settings and events. This is one of those series I read and realize there's no way I could write such a thing myself...it just plays to things that I enjoy reading but wouldn't be able to pull together.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. Overall, I had no major problems with the writing. I thought that perhaps too much time was spent on one character's change, with two separate lengthy internal monologues that I thought overlapped quite a bit of content. One other nitpick would be when two completely unrelated characters from completely different backgrounds and eras start quoting from what sounds to me to be the same Bible translation. In my Bible Study, no one reads from the same translation, so I don't know why these characters would both be using the same translation, unless it's restrictions from the publishing house needing just one translation.
(Edited for knowledge--in the comments, there's a good discussion about the appropriateness of using KJV. Upon a closer look, I saw that one of the aforementioned characters quotes a verse in what--edited again--what wasn't at all KJV, and what Meagan Myhren-Bennett indicated appears to be at least partly from an English translation of the Knox Bible. I don't see that verbiage anywhere on the entire Internet except for in this book, but the end of the verse appears to be KJV, with different punctuation, though that could again be the Knox Bible. Dr. Young is still a couple hundred years "older" than the other character...but point taken that some churches even today still stick to KJV, though I see no reason why this second character's church would have specifically been using "thees" and "thous".)
Some of the descriptions felt over-long to me. That's more my preference than a problem, but given that literally the whole world is hanging in the balance, I felt like the descriptions, which were fine and even eloquent in previous books, slowed things down a bit too much.
Clarity - 4 out of 5. I felt like things got perhaps a bit muddled by the end, but that does make sense, given the plotline. (And in fairness to Lawhead, I may not have read as closely as I should have everywhere, since I was so eager to find out what happened.
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. Not everything in this book went along with how I picture the universe and God working, and, fair or not, the idea of God's works being undone didn't really work for me. (Though the scientists here also say that most people don't believe in global warming despite scientific evidence, so I guess that's the same reasoning here?) Etzel also remains superhumanly good, but that's not impossible. Maybe implausible, but I've heard of forgiveness similar to his in real life (and he's technically not in our world anyway).
Positive - 5 out of 5. Overall a happy ending and Etzel's actions continue to amaze.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. Probably my only real disappointment was that I saw the series as being set up as a quest for the Skin Map, more than the Spirit Well itself, but in this last book, the Skin Map is of no significance. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this structure, but I think subconsciously it feels just a touch off because of that. Certainly, this was an enjoyable and satisfying end to the series nonetheless.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Anyone who read Books 1 and 2 in the series.
Total Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars
Please visit my fellow adventurers on this month's tour!
Thomas Clayton Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Jason Joyner
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Audrey Sauble
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book. Also free tattoos. The temporary kind.
Book: The Fatal Tree by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook)
Ridiculously simplified summary:
In the concluding book of the Bright Empires series, our world--and all worlds--are spinning into chaos, with strange, unexplainable events and anomalies as the universe undoes itself. Kit, Mina, Cass and the other ley-travelers must travel through different times and universes to try to fix all timelines. Can they prevent the collapse of time and space?
Content: This was overflowing with Christian content, with inspiring acts of forgiveness, redemption, and even a vision of God. (I still have some problems with the concept that humans could take actions that would cause everything God created to have never existed...but since--spoiler alert!--the multiple array of universes in existence are not destroyed--one could argue that humans can't destroy everything God ever created because God would put in place the people who could prevent it.)
There is a bit of cursing that surprised me--I can't say it was unwarranted, but it surprised me.
Rating:
Characters - 7 out of 10. Like many series, mostly the same characters inhabit this final book, without many additions. A fairly large number of scientists came along; they blurred together for me. One character has a very drastic change, which I thought worked well. Most of the others were more or less steady. Lady Haven and Mina, the most strong-willed female characters here, had quite a few similarities, but since I like that kind of woman, it didn't bother me. Characterization wasn't really the focus here, but I had no real problems. If you read the earlier books and liked the characters there, you'll probably like them here.
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. I'll talk more about this Wednesday and this ties into plausibility, but to me, I thought the stakes were too high, if that's a thing. I just could not believe that the entire world--all worlds--would not only be destroyed, but would be completely undone, so that they never existed. Theology aside, the stakes are so high that you know full well that the worst really can't actually happen.
To balance this, Lawhead occasionally put beloved characters into peril, which was more exciting, because there's certainly no guarantee that any lead character will survive these newly unstable worlds. And speaking of instability, Lawhead did a very good job of showing the effects of our world falling apart...the thought of a bridge simply vanishing while people are driving across it scares me more than the thought of all of God's creation being undone, because it just feels more plausible.
World building - 5 out of 5. The entire series shows a high level of detail and realism. I'm continually impressed by the way Lawhead integrates so many different historical and historically-inspired settings and events. This is one of those series I read and realize there's no way I could write such a thing myself...it just plays to things that I enjoy reading but wouldn't be able to pull together.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. Overall, I had no major problems with the writing. I thought that perhaps too much time was spent on one character's change, with two separate lengthy internal monologues that I thought overlapped quite a bit of content. One other nitpick would be when two completely unrelated characters from completely different backgrounds and eras start quoting from what sounds to me to be the same Bible translation. In my Bible Study, no one reads from the same translation, so I don't know why these characters would both be using the same translation, unless it's restrictions from the publishing house needing just one translation.
(Edited for knowledge--in the comments, there's a good discussion about the appropriateness of using KJV. Upon a closer look, I saw that one of the aforementioned characters quotes a verse in what--edited again--what wasn't at all KJV, and what Meagan Myhren-Bennett indicated appears to be at least partly from an English translation of the Knox Bible. I don't see that verbiage anywhere on the entire Internet except for in this book, but the end of the verse appears to be KJV, with different punctuation, though that could again be the Knox Bible. Dr. Young is still a couple hundred years "older" than the other character...but point taken that some churches even today still stick to KJV, though I see no reason why this second character's church would have specifically been using "thees" and "thous".)
Some of the descriptions felt over-long to me. That's more my preference than a problem, but given that literally the whole world is hanging in the balance, I felt like the descriptions, which were fine and even eloquent in previous books, slowed things down a bit too much.
Clarity - 4 out of 5. I felt like things got perhaps a bit muddled by the end, but that does make sense, given the plotline. (And in fairness to Lawhead, I may not have read as closely as I should have everywhere, since I was so eager to find out what happened.
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. Not everything in this book went along with how I picture the universe and God working, and, fair or not, the idea of God's works being undone didn't really work for me. (Though the scientists here also say that most people don't believe in global warming despite scientific evidence, so I guess that's the same reasoning here?) Etzel also remains superhumanly good, but that's not impossible. Maybe implausible, but I've heard of forgiveness similar to his in real life (and he's technically not in our world anyway).
Positive - 5 out of 5. Overall a happy ending and Etzel's actions continue to amaze.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. Probably my only real disappointment was that I saw the series as being set up as a quest for the Skin Map, more than the Spirit Well itself, but in this last book, the Skin Map is of no significance. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this structure, but I think subconsciously it feels just a touch off because of that. Certainly, this was an enjoyable and satisfying end to the series nonetheless.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Anyone who read Books 1 and 2 in the series.
Total Rating: 4.0 out of 5 stars
Please visit my fellow adventurers on this month's tour!
Thomas Clayton Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Jason Joyner
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Audrey Sauble
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book. Also free tattoos. The temporary kind.
Monday, December 15, 2014
In Which I Become an Illustrated Woman - The Fatal Tree - Stephen R. Lawhead - CSFF Blog Tour
This is Julie with the CSFF Blog tour! This month's book is The Fatal Tree by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook), the final book in the epic Bright Empires Series.
When we last left our intrepid heroes, they were desperately searching through all possible timelines to try to prevent the complete unraveling and undoing of all creation.
But more importantly, members of the CSFF Blog Tour were given the option to be sent tattoos of symbols such as might have been found on the Skin Map, with the provision that recipients would arrange for a display of said tattoos on flesh.
Hey. Is this thing working?
All right! I am ready to travel!
Now, which way is Sedona...?
Please visit my fellow adventurers on this month's tour!
Thomas Clayton Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Jason Joyner
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Audrey Sauble
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book. Also free tattoos. The temporary kind.
When we last left our intrepid heroes, they were desperately searching through all possible timelines to try to prevent the complete unraveling and undoing of all creation.
But more importantly, members of the CSFF Blog Tour were given the option to be sent tattoos of symbols such as might have been found on the Skin Map, with the provision that recipients would arrange for a display of said tattoos on flesh.
Hey. Is this thing working?
All right! I am ready to travel!
Now, which way is Sedona...?
Please visit my fellow adventurers on this month's tour!
Thomas Clayton Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Jason Joyner
Janeen Ippolito
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Audrey Sauble
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book. Also free tattoos. The temporary kind.
Monday, April 21, 2014
Review - Numb - John W. Otte - CSFF Blog Tour
Another book review by Julie, for the CSFF Blog Tour!
Book: Numb by John W. Otte
Ridiculously simplified summary:
"Not that the prospect of killing more people worried him; all fell short of the glory of God and deserved whatever they received. But it was a logistical nightmare."
Crusader, an assassin gifted by the Almighty with the inability to feel pain and emotion, does the work of the Ministrix. But when he's sent on a mission to kill Isolda Westin, seeing her face makes him start to feel...and he can't pull the trigger. Will Crusader and Isolda be able to outwit the Ministrix?
Content: Christian references throughout; I'm not sure how they'd read to a non-believer; they seemed more geared to the Christian set. (And fair enough; the vast majority of readers of Christian books are Christians, so why not?) I found the idea of new believers being discipled for years is an especially-welcome addition to speculative fiction, where many characters who are effectively Christians don't even attend church or have any formal training at all.
I do wonder if the Christian characters might have been referencing the Bible just a little out of context to emphasize their pacifism (whereas the Ministrix twist it massively). I didn't care for the phrase (about God) "but that's not the way He works anymore", the phrasing of which implied to me that she was saying God is not unchanging.
On the other hand, I am not a pastor like Otte is. Either way, by the end I was actually looking up Matthew 28:19 at Blue Letter Bible to try to prove a point against the bad guys. Whether or not my quibbles have any legitimacy, it's hard to find fault with a legitimately Christian book that made me actually think a little about my faith and check in the Bible.
Crusader is an assassin, but I was still surprised and a little nauseated by the level of gore and detail in the early parts of the book (like the "wet sound" of a knife during a stabbing). Even near the end, Crusader seemed to take life kind of casually, although that belief is certainly not glorified.
With a little tweaking, I think this could have actually doubled as a Christian romance; the romantic arc sort of mirrors those, and the only point of view characters are Crusader and Isolda. (I've read enough Christian romances that I don't feel like the romance here quite matches up to that, but it was interesting to see, given the genre.)
Rating:
Characters - 7 out of 10. The characters were interesting overall. I felt like some of them blurred together (that could be the sheer volume, as there are 3 distinct groups of people here, and also the twists of alliances that happen throughout). Aside from Crusader, I didn't get a deep sense of any of their interests and so forth. Isolda was likable enough and Crusader was fairly sympathetic, though I'm not sure "like" is the word I'd use to describe him. It was nice to see female characters in more modern roles (Isolda is an engineer and Elata is a gruff commander who I couldn't help but see as related to Captain Amelia in Treasure Planet). I found the more minor characters, like Krestyanov and Elata, to be a bit more entertaining than the point of view characters, but that could just be because we see less of them than we do the others.
Suspense/stakes - 5 out of 5. To me, this was a page-turner full of twists and danger. I did (kind of) guess Isolda's significance the moment we saw how many credits she was worth, and I got suitably irritated when I as a reader was purposely left in the dark for several chapters about what was in a certain file. But I was blindsided by most of the other surprises, most of which made sense when you go back and look at them.
World building - 5 out of 5. Three different societies and each society had its own rules and ideas. There were even groups within groups, like the Engineering Guild, and enough time to describe (seemingly) extraneous technology like holographic simulators that allow teddy bears to chase children and "glomp" them.
The space travel ideas were fantastical but interesting and the technologies "sounded" plausible to me. Otte shows a talent for painting a world with just the right level of detail--not too much to get bogged down in it, but not so little that it's dull. A search shows the phrase "Toleration Act" coming up just 6 times, and I don't see it explained in detail anywhere, but there's enough context to understand some of the issues with it.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. I found more typos than I was expecting, including an outright misspelling. That said, I only saw several typos; the book was not rife with them. I also read an electronic copy; perhaps the print version didn't have those problems. Early on there were some phrasings I found awkward, like using the same word twice in one sentence, but as the story progressed either the editing got better or I got more absorbed. For the most part, the writing was just how I like it; not too fancy but got the job done, and highly readable, with a few poetic bits thrown in for good measure. There were some witty turns of phrase and a light touch of humor here, which I appreciated.
(I would have liked to see Isolda react to a certain Twist, but maybe that would be addressed in a sequel...?)
Clarity - 3 out of 5. As exciting as the ride was, there were so many twists and so many characters, I did find myself getting lost here and there. Not a dealbreaker by any means...I think it got tricky because you get these exciting scenes where you want to know what happens and read quickly, while there may be blink-and-you-miss-it references contained in there. I also didn't quite follow Crusader's Numbness, which seemed to ebb and flow, sometimes without explanation. Even early on, I couldn't necessarily see what classified his emotions/etc. as "numb" and once he met Isolda, almost all the didn't seem to me like he was numb at all.
Plausibility/believability - 2 out of 5. To reiterate, I thought the worldbuilding was believable and excellent. My top issue with plausibility is the romance element. Given what Isolda goes through early in the book, I'm frankly shocked that she would ever think of her would-be assassin in any sort of romantic light, let alone as quickly as she did. I didn't feel like she even acknowledged her earlier poor judgment and her further lack of judgment in falling for him, and I don't see why she did.
By the end, there have been several things that happened which were either massive coincidences (secular view) or else providence (Christian view). I didn't feel like those elements were acknowledged as being put in place by God. I'm pretty sure that in the world of this novel, God DID put those things together, but I would've loved to see that expressly mentioned.
Positive - 4 out of 5. Given all the characters go through, this ends as happily as could be expected, and it gets me wondering how they may help better their world.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. Coming away from this book, I feel like the official descriptions were kind of misleading and didn't really point to the story I expected. I'd thought Crusader would make his choice when he saw Isolda and then immediately save her and go on the run with her. Instead, Crusader struggles repeatedly, torn between wanting to kill Isolda and not (which might be part of why the romance didn't work for me). And there are twists and betrayals and intrigue and issues to deal with in the Ministrix and rescues and separations... It's still a good story, but it's much more complicated than what I'd expected from the blurbs.
I found it an enjoyable read overall, and was left with some things to think about.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of science fiction set in space.
Total Rating: 3.9 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Julie Bihn
Jennifer Bogart
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
Vicky DealSharingAunt
Carol Gehringer
Victor Gentile
Rebekah Gyger
Nikole Hahn
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Jennette Mbewe
Amber McCallister
Shannon McDermott
Shannon McNear
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Faye Oygard
Writer Rani
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
Nicole White
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Book: Numb by John W. Otte
Ridiculously simplified summary:
"Not that the prospect of killing more people worried him; all fell short of the glory of God and deserved whatever they received. But it was a logistical nightmare."
Crusader, an assassin gifted by the Almighty with the inability to feel pain and emotion, does the work of the Ministrix. But when he's sent on a mission to kill Isolda Westin, seeing her face makes him start to feel...and he can't pull the trigger. Will Crusader and Isolda be able to outwit the Ministrix?
Content: Christian references throughout; I'm not sure how they'd read to a non-believer; they seemed more geared to the Christian set. (And fair enough; the vast majority of readers of Christian books are Christians, so why not?) I found the idea of new believers being discipled for years is an especially-welcome addition to speculative fiction, where many characters who are effectively Christians don't even attend church or have any formal training at all.
I do wonder if the Christian characters might have been referencing the Bible just a little out of context to emphasize their pacifism (whereas the Ministrix twist it massively). I didn't care for the phrase (about God) "but that's not the way He works anymore", the phrasing of which implied to me that she was saying God is not unchanging.
On the other hand, I am not a pastor like Otte is. Either way, by the end I was actually looking up Matthew 28:19 at Blue Letter Bible to try to prove a point against the bad guys. Whether or not my quibbles have any legitimacy, it's hard to find fault with a legitimately Christian book that made me actually think a little about my faith and check in the Bible.
Crusader is an assassin, but I was still surprised and a little nauseated by the level of gore and detail in the early parts of the book (like the "wet sound" of a knife during a stabbing). Even near the end, Crusader seemed to take life kind of casually, although that belief is certainly not glorified.
With a little tweaking, I think this could have actually doubled as a Christian romance; the romantic arc sort of mirrors those, and the only point of view characters are Crusader and Isolda. (I've read enough Christian romances that I don't feel like the romance here quite matches up to that, but it was interesting to see, given the genre.)
Rating:
Characters - 7 out of 10. The characters were interesting overall. I felt like some of them blurred together (that could be the sheer volume, as there are 3 distinct groups of people here, and also the twists of alliances that happen throughout). Aside from Crusader, I didn't get a deep sense of any of their interests and so forth. Isolda was likable enough and Crusader was fairly sympathetic, though I'm not sure "like" is the word I'd use to describe him. It was nice to see female characters in more modern roles (Isolda is an engineer and Elata is a gruff commander who I couldn't help but see as related to Captain Amelia in Treasure Planet). I found the more minor characters, like Krestyanov and Elata, to be a bit more entertaining than the point of view characters, but that could just be because we see less of them than we do the others.
Suspense/stakes - 5 out of 5. To me, this was a page-turner full of twists and danger. I did (kind of) guess Isolda's significance the moment we saw how many credits she was worth, and I got suitably irritated when I as a reader was purposely left in the dark for several chapters about what was in a certain file. But I was blindsided by most of the other surprises, most of which made sense when you go back and look at them.
World building - 5 out of 5. Three different societies and each society had its own rules and ideas. There were even groups within groups, like the Engineering Guild, and enough time to describe (seemingly) extraneous technology like holographic simulators that allow teddy bears to chase children and "glomp" them.
The space travel ideas were fantastical but interesting and the technologies "sounded" plausible to me. Otte shows a talent for painting a world with just the right level of detail--not too much to get bogged down in it, but not so little that it's dull. A search shows the phrase "Toleration Act" coming up just 6 times, and I don't see it explained in detail anywhere, but there's enough context to understand some of the issues with it.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. I found more typos than I was expecting, including an outright misspelling. That said, I only saw several typos; the book was not rife with them. I also read an electronic copy; perhaps the print version didn't have those problems. Early on there were some phrasings I found awkward, like using the same word twice in one sentence, but as the story progressed either the editing got better or I got more absorbed. For the most part, the writing was just how I like it; not too fancy but got the job done, and highly readable, with a few poetic bits thrown in for good measure. There were some witty turns of phrase and a light touch of humor here, which I appreciated.
(I would have liked to see Isolda react to a certain Twist, but maybe that would be addressed in a sequel...?)
Clarity - 3 out of 5. As exciting as the ride was, there were so many twists and so many characters, I did find myself getting lost here and there. Not a dealbreaker by any means...I think it got tricky because you get these exciting scenes where you want to know what happens and read quickly, while there may be blink-and-you-miss-it references contained in there. I also didn't quite follow Crusader's Numbness, which seemed to ebb and flow, sometimes without explanation. Even early on, I couldn't necessarily see what classified his emotions/etc. as "numb" and once he met Isolda, almost all the didn't seem to me like he was numb at all.
Plausibility/believability - 2 out of 5. To reiterate, I thought the worldbuilding was believable and excellent. My top issue with plausibility is the romance element. Given what Isolda goes through early in the book, I'm frankly shocked that she would ever think of her would-be assassin in any sort of romantic light, let alone as quickly as she did. I didn't feel like she even acknowledged her earlier poor judgment and her further lack of judgment in falling for him, and I don't see why she did.
By the end, there have been several things that happened which were either massive coincidences (secular view) or else providence (Christian view). I didn't feel like those elements were acknowledged as being put in place by God. I'm pretty sure that in the world of this novel, God DID put those things together, but I would've loved to see that expressly mentioned.
Positive - 4 out of 5. Given all the characters go through, this ends as happily as could be expected, and it gets me wondering how they may help better their world.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. Coming away from this book, I feel like the official descriptions were kind of misleading and didn't really point to the story I expected. I'd thought Crusader would make his choice when he saw Isolda and then immediately save her and go on the run with her. Instead, Crusader struggles repeatedly, torn between wanting to kill Isolda and not (which might be part of why the romance didn't work for me). And there are twists and betrayals and intrigue and issues to deal with in the Ministrix and rescues and separations... It's still a good story, but it's much more complicated than what I'd expected from the blurbs.
I found it an enjoyable read overall, and was left with some things to think about.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of science fiction set in space.
Total Rating: 3.9 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Julie Bihn
Jennifer Bogart
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
Vicky DealSharingAunt
Carol Gehringer
Victor Gentile
Rebekah Gyger
Nikole Hahn
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Emileigh Latham
Rebekah Loper
Jennette Mbewe
Amber McCallister
Shannon McDermott
Shannon McNear
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Faye Oygard
Writer Rani
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Phyllis Wheeler
Nicole White
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Book Review - One Realm Beyond by Donita K. Paul - CSFF Blog Tour
Another book review by Julie, for the CSFF Blog Tour!
Book: One Realm Beyond by Donita K. Paul.
Ridiculously simplified summary: Cantor D'Ahma starts his journey to become a realm-walker, someone who can travel through portals between the stack of realms in his universe. When attempting to find a mor dragon "constant" to accompany him on his journeys, he meets Bridger, a clumsy dragon who insists the two are destined to be partners. As he attempts to evade his would-be constant, Cantor finds other companions, such as Bixby, a diminutive, multi-talented girl with a love of fashion.
Unfortunately, the Realm Walkers Guild has become corrupt and treacherous. Will Cantor and his friends be able to overcome?
Content: Substantial references to God ("Primen") and even what is in effect an angel (and maybe my favorite fantasy presentation of one yet). Spiritual threads throughout, and I thought they were handled very well. There is some violence, though it's never glorified, and very minor hints of romance.
Rating:
Characters - 8 out of 10. I didn't find Cantor to be particularly interesting, perhaps because he is a novice surrounded by a cast of such entertaining characters who are (for the most part) capable. Bridger the dragon quickly grew on me and the precocious Bixby is delightful. Another dragon, Totobee-Rodolow, entertained me quite a bit, no matter how many times she said "darling." I am not particularly girly and I don't think that girls (or boys) need to fit neatly into traditional roles, but it's strangely refreshing to see capable women who have a couple stereotypically "feminine" traits like a love of shopping and fashion.
I also felt like Cantor's level of annoyance with Bridger was well out of proportion with Bridger's actions, which made it hard for me to like him. I know it's a completely legitimate technique to have a character start out with bad traits and then grow, but I never liked it. (He does get a super-cool talent later in the book though, and I'm hoping to see him grow.)
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. It was page 63 before the story grabbed me (that's when Bixby appears, if you were keeping count). It's very, very difficult for me to get into a story where the main character isn't having meaningful interactions with others, so Bixby was definitely a welcome addition.
Overall, I was kind of fuzzy on what the stakes were. Cantor wanted to be a realm walker, but he can already go through portals, so I didn't get a sense on what he "needed" to do until his training actually starts, and there are a lot of obstacles before he gets there. It was only in the last 100 pages or so when an acute, urgent problem (more than "corruption") came up to be solved. I would have preferred if the tension could have been stretched farther.
World building - 4 out of 5. There are some really interesting ideas here, including the idea of several flat "realms" in one stack, with people being able to travel between them through portals. (Brock Eastman has a good interview with Mrs. Paul about the world building.) The technologies such as "hampers" were delightful--I don't think a fantasy is much fun if it doesn't have something in it that a reader thinks would be fun to do or to have.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. I noticed what struck me as a few typos, mostly about midway through, like "eves of the house" and at one point a character says "What" with no punctuation anywhere at the end of the sentence/paragraph. Of course, any errors that slipped through the editor were balanced by some great turns of phrases.
There are some excellent descriptions when Important Dramatic Happen at the end, too. You'll know them when you get there.
Clarity - 3 out of 5. There were good details about food and some architecture, but for whatever reason, I never got a great sense of the realms' technology levels or social structures. That could be a problem of how many realms exist, or maybe even "spillover" that realm walkers would cause by traveling between realms, perhaps bringing technologies and fashions. There are details that are excellent, but for whatever reason I struggled with the big picture. And actually, I couldn't even easily picture how large the mor dragons were. (Although in my defense, they are not only shape-shifters, but size-shifters. Maybe the reader was meant to come up with their own picture.)
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. This is tricky because it's fantasy. OK, I don't think the idea of stacks of realms holds up to physics, but I don't think it's meant to. I believe it for this world, and that's fine.
Other aspects strained my belief a little, though. For instance, I don't feel like it was explained why a human needed a mor dragon constant (as opposed to some other creature, another human, etc.). I know that the heroes of old did it, and of course Mrs. Paul (and many others) love dragons, so fair enough, but to me, it didn't feel like it was an organic choice. Likewise, there was a scene where a character is put into peril of being crushed by a mor dragon, because they expand when they are asleep--but I don't recall being told about them expanding beforehand, so it seemed kind of out of the blue to me, that the dragons would get bigger as they slept.
Positive - 3 out of 5. I don't think I can say much about this without going into spoiler territory. Though I can say that I like my books to end with all the characters happy and since this is a series, that doesn't happen. But the characters also keep their faith in Primen.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. To me, the characters carry the story, and there was some delightful whimsy. I read that Mrs. Paul had some serious challenges with writing Book 2 (see the aforementioned interview by Brock Eastman); I pray that her works come together well. There's a lot of potential in this series.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of fantasy, dragons and light political intrigue.
Total Rating: 3.7 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Here are the other blog tour participants!
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Mike Coville
Pauline Creeden
Vicky DealSharingAunt
Carol Gehringer
Rebekah Gyger
Janeen Ippolito
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Krystine Kercher
Emileigh Latham
Jennette Mbewe
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Donita K. Paul
Audrey Sauble
Chawna Schroeder
James Somers
Jojo Sutis
Jessica Thomas
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Jill Williamson
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Book: One Realm Beyond by Donita K. Paul.
Ridiculously simplified summary: Cantor D'Ahma starts his journey to become a realm-walker, someone who can travel through portals between the stack of realms in his universe. When attempting to find a mor dragon "constant" to accompany him on his journeys, he meets Bridger, a clumsy dragon who insists the two are destined to be partners. As he attempts to evade his would-be constant, Cantor finds other companions, such as Bixby, a diminutive, multi-talented girl with a love of fashion.
Unfortunately, the Realm Walkers Guild has become corrupt and treacherous. Will Cantor and his friends be able to overcome?
Content: Substantial references to God ("Primen") and even what is in effect an angel (and maybe my favorite fantasy presentation of one yet). Spiritual threads throughout, and I thought they were handled very well. There is some violence, though it's never glorified, and very minor hints of romance.
Rating:
Characters - 8 out of 10. I didn't find Cantor to be particularly interesting, perhaps because he is a novice surrounded by a cast of such entertaining characters who are (for the most part) capable. Bridger the dragon quickly grew on me and the precocious Bixby is delightful. Another dragon, Totobee-Rodolow, entertained me quite a bit, no matter how many times she said "darling." I am not particularly girly and I don't think that girls (or boys) need to fit neatly into traditional roles, but it's strangely refreshing to see capable women who have a couple stereotypically "feminine" traits like a love of shopping and fashion.
I also felt like Cantor's level of annoyance with Bridger was well out of proportion with Bridger's actions, which made it hard for me to like him. I know it's a completely legitimate technique to have a character start out with bad traits and then grow, but I never liked it. (He does get a super-cool talent later in the book though, and I'm hoping to see him grow.)
Suspense/stakes - 3 out of 5. It was page 63 before the story grabbed me (that's when Bixby appears, if you were keeping count). It's very, very difficult for me to get into a story where the main character isn't having meaningful interactions with others, so Bixby was definitely a welcome addition.
Overall, I was kind of fuzzy on what the stakes were. Cantor wanted to be a realm walker, but he can already go through portals, so I didn't get a sense on what he "needed" to do until his training actually starts, and there are a lot of obstacles before he gets there. It was only in the last 100 pages or so when an acute, urgent problem (more than "corruption") came up to be solved. I would have preferred if the tension could have been stretched farther.
World building - 4 out of 5. There are some really interesting ideas here, including the idea of several flat "realms" in one stack, with people being able to travel between them through portals. (Brock Eastman has a good interview with Mrs. Paul about the world building.) The technologies such as "hampers" were delightful--I don't think a fantasy is much fun if it doesn't have something in it that a reader thinks would be fun to do or to have.
Writing/editing - 4 out of 5. I noticed what struck me as a few typos, mostly about midway through, like "eves of the house" and at one point a character says "What" with no punctuation anywhere at the end of the sentence/paragraph. Of course, any errors that slipped through the editor were balanced by some great turns of phrases.
Cantor led the way through the maze of corridors, alleys, and streets inside the barracks. It reminded him of a rabbit warren. Right. A rabbit warren with evil bunnies. (p. 126)(Actually, did you know Napoleon was once attacked by rabbits? Not evil ones, but still.)
There are some excellent descriptions when Important Dramatic Happen at the end, too. You'll know them when you get there.
Clarity - 3 out of 5. There were good details about food and some architecture, but for whatever reason, I never got a great sense of the realms' technology levels or social structures. That could be a problem of how many realms exist, or maybe even "spillover" that realm walkers would cause by traveling between realms, perhaps bringing technologies and fashions. There are details that are excellent, but for whatever reason I struggled with the big picture. And actually, I couldn't even easily picture how large the mor dragons were. (Although in my defense, they are not only shape-shifters, but size-shifters. Maybe the reader was meant to come up with their own picture.)
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. This is tricky because it's fantasy. OK, I don't think the idea of stacks of realms holds up to physics, but I don't think it's meant to. I believe it for this world, and that's fine.
Other aspects strained my belief a little, though. For instance, I don't feel like it was explained why a human needed a mor dragon constant (as opposed to some other creature, another human, etc.). I know that the heroes of old did it, and of course Mrs. Paul (and many others) love dragons, so fair enough, but to me, it didn't feel like it was an organic choice. Likewise, there was a scene where a character is put into peril of being crushed by a mor dragon, because they expand when they are asleep--but I don't recall being told about them expanding beforehand, so it seemed kind of out of the blue to me, that the dragons would get bigger as they slept.
Positive - 3 out of 5. I don't think I can say much about this without going into spoiler territory. Though I can say that I like my books to end with all the characters happy and since this is a series, that doesn't happen. But the characters also keep their faith in Primen.
Gut reaction - 4 out of 5. To me, the characters carry the story, and there was some delightful whimsy. I read that Mrs. Paul had some serious challenges with writing Book 2 (see the aforementioned interview by Brock Eastman); I pray that her works come together well. There's a lot of potential in this series.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of fantasy, dragons and light political intrigue.
Total Rating: 3.7 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Here are the other blog tour participants!
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Mike Coville
Pauline Creeden
Vicky DealSharingAunt
Carol Gehringer
Rebekah Gyger
Janeen Ippolito
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Krystine Kercher
Emileigh Latham
Jennette Mbewe
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Donita K. Paul
Audrey Sauble
Chawna Schroeder
James Somers
Jojo Sutis
Jessica Thomas
Steve Trower
Shane Werlinger
Jill Williamson
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Dystopian Disney - Disney's SimTag--er--MagicBand - Outcasts by Jill Williamson - CSFF Blog Tour
Julie again, still writing about Outcasts (The Safe Lands Book 2) by Jill Williamson
No, really, I am. Bear with me.
So I'm planning a trip to Disney World and lucky me, Disney sent me my very own SimTag to use on my trip!
OK, they call it a MagicBand (which, like "SimTag, is a one run-together nonsense word). And it's not implantable (yet, anyway). It doesn't give you the ability to add virtual tattoos to your body.
But it contains short-range RFID technology and a small battery that broadcasts your location while you're on Disney World property. You have the option to link it to your credit card and use it to make purchases. It also serves as your room key (and stores Fastpasses you book in advance), so you can't easily leave it behind in your room and enjoy your day. And technically you are supposed to be permitted to get a room key and maybe a hard copy ticket instead of a MagicBand, but I hear some people have been denied that opportunity.
YES! Finally! End of the world fiction and Disney come together at last!
Actually, I'm not personally upset by the idea of using a MagicBand on a one-time vacation. And almost everyone in the Disney communities I've been following is more annoyed by the idea of being restricted to just three Fastpasses per day, than any idea of Disney tracking your movements. I figure between cell phones, voluntary information provided on Facebook, and other interaction, most people, including me, could probably be tracked fairly easily if the right people wanted to.
It's kind of scary to think of how little privacy people have today...although a couple hundred years ago, if you lived in a small town, the folks in your town probably knew everything about you anyway. I'm so introverted, I'd rather it were strangers looking at my data in aggregate, than people I know finding out things about me.
The SimTags reminded me a bit of the Mark of the Beast, though I don't know how allegorical the Safe Lands series is.
One thing Williamson got right in the Safe Lands series is people's inherent desire to customize things. I'm not at the level of wanting tattoos on my body a la SimArt, but I'm not above using a bit of glitter nail polish. Even if it doesn't photograph well.
Here are the other CSFF Blog Tour bloggers:
Red Bissell
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Chawna Schroeder
Jacque Stengl
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free Advance Readers Copy of this book.
No, really, I am. Bear with me.
So I'm planning a trip to Disney World and lucky me, Disney sent me my very own SimTag to use on my trip!
OK, they call it a MagicBand (which, like "SimTag, is a one run-together nonsense word). And it's not implantable (yet, anyway). It doesn't give you the ability to add virtual tattoos to your body.
But it contains short-range RFID technology and a small battery that broadcasts your location while you're on Disney World property. You have the option to link it to your credit card and use it to make purchases. It also serves as your room key (and stores Fastpasses you book in advance), so you can't easily leave it behind in your room and enjoy your day. And technically you are supposed to be permitted to get a room key and maybe a hard copy ticket instead of a MagicBand, but I hear some people have been denied that opportunity.
YES! Finally! End of the world fiction and Disney come together at last!
Actually, I'm not personally upset by the idea of using a MagicBand on a one-time vacation. And almost everyone in the Disney communities I've been following is more annoyed by the idea of being restricted to just three Fastpasses per day, than any idea of Disney tracking your movements. I figure between cell phones, voluntary information provided on Facebook, and other interaction, most people, including me, could probably be tracked fairly easily if the right people wanted to.
It's kind of scary to think of how little privacy people have today...although a couple hundred years ago, if you lived in a small town, the folks in your town probably knew everything about you anyway. I'm so introverted, I'd rather it were strangers looking at my data in aggregate, than people I know finding out things about me.
The SimTags reminded me a bit of the Mark of the Beast, though I don't know how allegorical the Safe Lands series is.
And he causes all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free men and the slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name. - Revelation 13:16-18 (NASB)At least it doesn't matter which wrist you wear your MagicBand is on, and Disney will be happy to take your cash, credit cards, Disney Dollars, or gift cards. So that's a happy thought, I guess!
One thing Williamson got right in the Safe Lands series is people's inherent desire to customize things. I'm not at the level of wanting tattoos on my body a la SimArt, but I'm not above using a bit of glitter nail polish. Even if it doesn't photograph well.
Here are the other CSFF Blog Tour bloggers:
Red Bissell
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Chawna Schroeder
Jacque Stengl
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free Advance Readers Copy of this book.
Monday, January 20, 2014
Review - Outcasts (The Safe Lands Book 2) by Jill Williamson - CSFF Blog Tour
Another book review by Julie! For 2014, I've updated the rating system.
Book: Outcasts (The Safe Lands Book 2) by Jill Williamson
Ridiculously simplified summary: Second in a series. Levi, Omar, and Mason are brothers whose entire village, Glenrock, was captured by the Safelanders. The Safelanders live for pleasure, force women into pregnancy, and are "liberated" at forty to be born into their next life. Previously, Levi and the other male survivors of Glenrock managed to free their women from the Safelanders' "harem," a place where the pregnant women are imprisoned/pampered. But their children remain imprisoned in boarding schools. With a group of rebels, the people of Glenrock make a daring rescue plan. Meanwhile, Omar and Mason--who are still "on the grid"--try their best to navigate the Safelands, hiding their rebel identities. Mason has doubts about Ciddah, the doctor he loves, while Omar has doubts about his own self-worth.
Content: Not very heavy on Christian content, though one character uses Bible references as encouragement--these would probably go over the heads of those who aren't familiar with the Bible. Overall, the religious content is probably on the borderline of what might make a vehement non-believer squirm.
As to other content, there is reference to sex and forced pregnancy and drug use, and not a small amount of violence. I'm sure it's nothing teens haven't been exposed to--certainly nothing as bad as the first couple chapters of a more famous dystopian book, 1984, which I found shelved in Young Adult at my library--but if I were a parent, I'm still not sure how I would feel if my young teen wanted to read it.
Rating:
Characters - 9 out of 10. This gets a high rating because I actually really like Mason, Shaylinn, and even Omar, as well as the rebel Zane--so much that I actually very much care what happens to them, something I don't feel at all in maybe half the books I read. (Although about halfway through I felt like Mason was channeling Sheldon Cooper a bit--was he that robotic in the first book? I still love him anyway.) Even Levi serves a place in the story, though he's still patronizing and controlling and rather sexist, and I still don't care for him at all as a person. This gets dinged just a little because there are just so many characters brought in that not every personality can be clear. For every well-visualized character there's another minor character that Williamson may have had clearly in her head, but that doesn't stand out for me.
I'm not particularly fond of the fact that by my count, every single female who does anything remotely interesting in the book (aside from one child) is a wife, mother, and/or love interest. That's not to say that there aren't memorable female characters, and some of the problem is the society of the Safelands altogether. But even in the rebel group--a group of which one member hints that Levi is being too patriarchal--there's not a woman of consequence to be seen. I'd love to see that remedied in Book 3.
Suspense/stakes - 4 out of 5. Much of the book was suspenseful and I read it over the course of several nights, without any lengthy pauses like I sometimes have for books that don't grab me. I did feel there were too many scenes of explaining plans (and that was generally in a council of men because yes, Levi thinks the women are too emotional for such discussions). In a couple of the rescue adventures, I felt like the action slowed to a crawl in places--I'm not sure if that was intentional or not, but I would've preferred if it had been just a bit faster-paced throughout. But overall I very much cared what happened.
World building - 5 out of 5. I think this is the series' greatest strength. I still don't get a true sense of Glenrock's society, but I don't think that's even necessary or helpful at this point. I found the slang and new words in the Safe Lands to be incredibly immersive--almost instantly I was pulled back into the world I remembered from the first book. "Hey-o, valentine. I've got to stop at the GIN, but then maybe we can vape and trade some paint. I'll tap you" is a semi-plausible paragraph that I concocted from memory. (Note that it is not my fault that some of the most memorable words had to do with illicit activity.) The technology is again very interesting, and I love reading about other societies.
Writing/editing - 5 out of 5*. This is tentative; I had an advance reader copy and actually spotted about 4 typos. I'm assuming that at least half of those will be weeded out for the final copy. Given it was an advance copy, I was a bit surprised those were the only problems I saw.
Clarity - 3 out of 5. First off, I have no idea how anyone who didn't read Book 1 would be able to keep track of the people here. I did read Book 1, not even six months ago, but I was still a bit lost at certain points. I didn't notice any concessions to the reader who didn't start at Book 1, though of course some information repeated from Book 1 would have made its way into this book. And even having read Book 1, I got confused with who some of the bad guys were and what their motivations were. Adding to the trouble is that two male characters have either a son or a father--everyone uses first names as far as I can see, except Zane once says something like his dad would kill him. So while these characters' personalities aren't the same, it takes some thinking to remember the familial relationships. (In fact, I forgot about a character being Bender's son for a very long stretch.)
Likewise, there is some confusion because the Safelander culture is to act young and yet to grow up quickly, so you certainly can't take cues from how people are acting to figure out if they're young, old, or what. Ciddah seemed to generally act like maybe a 25-year-old (and much older when it came to two people close to her). With his gender biases, I feel like Glenrock elder Levi could at times be mistaken for someone much older. Mason, the youngest in the family we focus on, is arguably the most mature of the brothers. Omar is the only one who stands out to me as acting "like" a teenager/young adult.
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. I thought there were some aspects that could be considered either plot holes or mysteries, mostly concerning the tracking "Sim" chips that every Safelander has in his or her hand, but which the rebels take out (and apparently they can get away with wearing gloves containing "ghoulie"/dummy chips). If I were a Safelander, I'd give special scrutiny to anyone who wore gloves, personally... But there could be an explanation for all that which we haven't been shown yet. I just plain don't understand some of the bad guys' motivations; as far as I could tell, one's main motivation was that he's snapped and wants something that isn't at all normal in the Safe Lands.
Positive - 3 out of 5. One word. CLIFFHANGER! I really don't like cliffhangers, and this one ends on a pretty big one. But that said, I'm not sure how it could've ended any other way. There are still some potential doubts as to loyalties by the end, and characters with problems haven't magically recovered by the end. But that's pretty common for Book 2 in a series, and probably what should happen anyway.
Gut reaction - 5 out of 5. This book had kind of sexist undertones (yes, Levi is gently called to task for his sexism a couple times, but I still feel there's a distinct gender imbalance in both raw numbers and the significance and power of women versus men). And I felt like the second half or so was basically a series of rescue attempts, which got a bit old. But all that said...I still really enjoyed this book. Some engaging characters and a detailed world drew me in. I'm eager to read the conclusion.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of edgy dystopian science fiction who read Book 1.
Total Rating: 4.2 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Red Bissell
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Chawna Schroeder
Jacque Stengl
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free Advance Readers Copy of this book.
Book: Outcasts (The Safe Lands Book 2) by Jill Williamson
Ridiculously simplified summary: Second in a series. Levi, Omar, and Mason are brothers whose entire village, Glenrock, was captured by the Safelanders. The Safelanders live for pleasure, force women into pregnancy, and are "liberated" at forty to be born into their next life. Previously, Levi and the other male survivors of Glenrock managed to free their women from the Safelanders' "harem," a place where the pregnant women are imprisoned/pampered. But their children remain imprisoned in boarding schools. With a group of rebels, the people of Glenrock make a daring rescue plan. Meanwhile, Omar and Mason--who are still "on the grid"--try their best to navigate the Safelands, hiding their rebel identities. Mason has doubts about Ciddah, the doctor he loves, while Omar has doubts about his own self-worth.
Content: Not very heavy on Christian content, though one character uses Bible references as encouragement--these would probably go over the heads of those who aren't familiar with the Bible. Overall, the religious content is probably on the borderline of what might make a vehement non-believer squirm.
As to other content, there is reference to sex and forced pregnancy and drug use, and not a small amount of violence. I'm sure it's nothing teens haven't been exposed to--certainly nothing as bad as the first couple chapters of a more famous dystopian book, 1984, which I found shelved in Young Adult at my library--but if I were a parent, I'm still not sure how I would feel if my young teen wanted to read it.
Rating:
Characters - 9 out of 10. This gets a high rating because I actually really like Mason, Shaylinn, and even Omar, as well as the rebel Zane--so much that I actually very much care what happens to them, something I don't feel at all in maybe half the books I read. (Although about halfway through I felt like Mason was channeling Sheldon Cooper a bit--was he that robotic in the first book? I still love him anyway.) Even Levi serves a place in the story, though he's still patronizing and controlling and rather sexist, and I still don't care for him at all as a person. This gets dinged just a little because there are just so many characters brought in that not every personality can be clear. For every well-visualized character there's another minor character that Williamson may have had clearly in her head, but that doesn't stand out for me.
I'm not particularly fond of the fact that by my count, every single female who does anything remotely interesting in the book (aside from one child) is a wife, mother, and/or love interest. That's not to say that there aren't memorable female characters, and some of the problem is the society of the Safelands altogether. But even in the rebel group--a group of which one member hints that Levi is being too patriarchal--there's not a woman of consequence to be seen. I'd love to see that remedied in Book 3.
Suspense/stakes - 4 out of 5. Much of the book was suspenseful and I read it over the course of several nights, without any lengthy pauses like I sometimes have for books that don't grab me. I did feel there were too many scenes of explaining plans (and that was generally in a council of men because yes, Levi thinks the women are too emotional for such discussions). In a couple of the rescue adventures, I felt like the action slowed to a crawl in places--I'm not sure if that was intentional or not, but I would've preferred if it had been just a bit faster-paced throughout. But overall I very much cared what happened.
World building - 5 out of 5. I think this is the series' greatest strength. I still don't get a true sense of Glenrock's society, but I don't think that's even necessary or helpful at this point. I found the slang and new words in the Safe Lands to be incredibly immersive--almost instantly I was pulled back into the world I remembered from the first book. "Hey-o, valentine. I've got to stop at the GIN, but then maybe we can vape and trade some paint. I'll tap you" is a semi-plausible paragraph that I concocted from memory. (Note that it is not my fault that some of the most memorable words had to do with illicit activity.) The technology is again very interesting, and I love reading about other societies.
Writing/editing - 5 out of 5*. This is tentative; I had an advance reader copy and actually spotted about 4 typos. I'm assuming that at least half of those will be weeded out for the final copy. Given it was an advance copy, I was a bit surprised those were the only problems I saw.
Clarity - 3 out of 5. First off, I have no idea how anyone who didn't read Book 1 would be able to keep track of the people here. I did read Book 1, not even six months ago, but I was still a bit lost at certain points. I didn't notice any concessions to the reader who didn't start at Book 1, though of course some information repeated from Book 1 would have made its way into this book. And even having read Book 1, I got confused with who some of the bad guys were and what their motivations were. Adding to the trouble is that two male characters have either a son or a father--everyone uses first names as far as I can see, except Zane once says something like his dad would kill him. So while these characters' personalities aren't the same, it takes some thinking to remember the familial relationships. (In fact, I forgot about a character being Bender's son for a very long stretch.)
Likewise, there is some confusion because the Safelander culture is to act young and yet to grow up quickly, so you certainly can't take cues from how people are acting to figure out if they're young, old, or what. Ciddah seemed to generally act like maybe a 25-year-old (and much older when it came to two people close to her). With his gender biases, I feel like Glenrock elder Levi could at times be mistaken for someone much older. Mason, the youngest in the family we focus on, is arguably the most mature of the brothers. Omar is the only one who stands out to me as acting "like" a teenager/young adult.
Plausibility/believability - 3 out of 5. I thought there were some aspects that could be considered either plot holes or mysteries, mostly concerning the tracking "Sim" chips that every Safelander has in his or her hand, but which the rebels take out (and apparently they can get away with wearing gloves containing "ghoulie"/dummy chips). If I were a Safelander, I'd give special scrutiny to anyone who wore gloves, personally... But there could be an explanation for all that which we haven't been shown yet. I just plain don't understand some of the bad guys' motivations; as far as I could tell, one's main motivation was that he's snapped and wants something that isn't at all normal in the Safe Lands.
Positive - 3 out of 5. One word. CLIFFHANGER! I really don't like cliffhangers, and this one ends on a pretty big one. But that said, I'm not sure how it could've ended any other way. There are still some potential doubts as to loyalties by the end, and characters with problems haven't magically recovered by the end. But that's pretty common for Book 2 in a series, and probably what should happen anyway.
Gut reaction - 5 out of 5. This book had kind of sexist undertones (yes, Levi is gently called to task for his sexism a couple times, but I still feel there's a distinct gender imbalance in both raw numbers and the significance and power of women versus men). And I felt like the second half or so was basically a series of rescue attempts, which got a bit old. But all that said...I still really enjoyed this book. Some engaging characters and a detailed world drew me in. I'm eager to read the conclusion.
Free points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of edgy dystopian science fiction who read Book 1.
Total Rating: 4.2 out of 5 stars
Here are the other participants on the tour!
Red Bissell
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Pauline Creeden
April Erwin
Victor Gentile
Ryan Heart
Timothy Hicks
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Melanie @ Christian Bookshelf Reviews
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Joan Nienhuis
Nissa
Jalynn Patterson
Writer Rani
Chawna Schroeder
Jacque Stengl
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free Advance Readers Copy of this book.
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Review: Waterfall (River of Time #1) by Lisa Tawn Bergren
Another book review by Julie! This one's interesting because it reminds me quite a bit of my near-forever-work-in-progress Chosen: Bonnie of Sheshack. I guess every teenager secretly wants to get sucked into another world and find her own knight?
Book: Waterfall (River of Time #1) by Lisa Tawn Bergren
Ridiculously simplified summary: In modern-day Italy, an archaeologist's teenage daughter is drawn back to medieval times, where she is rescued by a handsome lord...who just happens to be betrothed. Taken into the castle, our heroine searches for her sister, hoping to get back home.
Content: Extremely light Christian content--I expect it might ramp up as the series progresses, but at the moment, though the people talk about praying to God and such every so often, Gabi isn't especially caught up in it. I don't think being a Christian would have any bearing on one's enjoyment of this book.
There is some violence, but given the medieval setting that seems reasonable enough. The torture is more upsetting, though if the story is to be believed, it was normal for the era (and that seems plausible to me). The main character, Gabi, is very physically attracted to a man who is betrothed.
Rating:
Compelling: 7 out of 10. I found the beginning dragged, but once Gabi achieved a particular goal (somewhere more than midway through if I recall correctly) I thought things got interesting and the story flew by. As the first in a series, I didn't find the ending completely satisfying, but that's typical.
Characters: 6 out of 10. I did not care for Gabi much at the beginning, though she did grow on me. The other of the characters were fine, but aside from Lady Rossi, Lia, and maybe Fortino, I didn't find anything particularly memorable about them. Marcello and Luca, the two lead men from medieval Italy, didn't feel SO much different than modern-day men to me, though Gabi makes a point of noticing how manly and different from modern men Marcello was, and Luca's a bit of a charmer. Lady Rossi, Marcello's betrothed, is interesting, though we are seeing her through jealous Gabi's eyes, so I have no idea if she is really a jerk (as Gabi thinks through most of the book) or if she's better/fiercer than expected (as Gabi thinks during part of the middle).
Writing/editing: 8 out of 10. I only noticed one minor typo ("I turned obediently and took a look swig, then another, ignoring how the liquid burned all the way down my throat and inside my gut."). I thought the style didn't quite feel like a teenager all the time, but it wasn't bad in that regard. There were a few good lines; my favorite was, in regards to a character with severe respiratory problems, "He still sounded like a sick seal..."
Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. This one's hard. I felt like the overall historical place-setting was very good--to me, it felt more real than most historical romances I've read. (Even though it's not always a romantic setting...chamber pots are referenced more than once.)
On the other hand, these people in medieval Italy discovered Gabi coming out of a tomb, in clothing more revealing than undergarments, and she's spirited, has little respect for her social "betters", and even insists on wielding a sword. And they like and even love her for it! It's an interesting conceit, but the fact that Gabi can fight off bad guys with a sword, in addition to her many other talents, felt like a bit much to me.
Conveniently, she is able to speak/pick up medieval Italian--if I recall correctly, she picked up some Italian from her parents' archaeological vacations. I don't find it exactly plausible that she could speak to these people as easily as she did--though there were some slip-ups. But it is tricky to get people in other worlds to be able to talk to each other, so I'm okay with it. Then again, she also knows some Latin and French, which puts her well ahead of the curve for most Americans...
Positive: 3 out of 5. While the ending left certain things unresolved, everything ended as well as could be expected. I have to ding it a little on "positive" due to the substantial threats of torture, occasional actual torture, and lines like:
Gut reaction: 4 out of 5. I'm not the target audience, and I hate to say I'm not even that interested in whether or not Gabi and Marcello get together. But Gabi's sister Lia and the knight who likes her, Luca, are likable enough, and the ideas interesting enough, I have some interest in reading some more.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of slightly mushy young-adult time-travel fiction.
Total Rating: 3.6 out of 5 stars
*I downloaded this book for free, I believe on Amazon.
Book: Waterfall (River of Time #1) by Lisa Tawn Bergren
Ridiculously simplified summary: In modern-day Italy, an archaeologist's teenage daughter is drawn back to medieval times, where she is rescued by a handsome lord...who just happens to be betrothed. Taken into the castle, our heroine searches for her sister, hoping to get back home.
Content: Extremely light Christian content--I expect it might ramp up as the series progresses, but at the moment, though the people talk about praying to God and such every so often, Gabi isn't especially caught up in it. I don't think being a Christian would have any bearing on one's enjoyment of this book.
There is some violence, but given the medieval setting that seems reasonable enough. The torture is more upsetting, though if the story is to be believed, it was normal for the era (and that seems plausible to me). The main character, Gabi, is very physically attracted to a man who is betrothed.
Rating:
Compelling: 7 out of 10. I found the beginning dragged, but once Gabi achieved a particular goal (somewhere more than midway through if I recall correctly) I thought things got interesting and the story flew by. As the first in a series, I didn't find the ending completely satisfying, but that's typical.
Characters: 6 out of 10. I did not care for Gabi much at the beginning, though she did grow on me. The other of the characters were fine, but aside from Lady Rossi, Lia, and maybe Fortino, I didn't find anything particularly memorable about them. Marcello and Luca, the two lead men from medieval Italy, didn't feel SO much different than modern-day men to me, though Gabi makes a point of noticing how manly and different from modern men Marcello was, and Luca's a bit of a charmer. Lady Rossi, Marcello's betrothed, is interesting, though we are seeing her through jealous Gabi's eyes, so I have no idea if she is really a jerk (as Gabi thinks through most of the book) or if she's better/fiercer than expected (as Gabi thinks during part of the middle).
Writing/editing: 8 out of 10. I only noticed one minor typo ("I turned obediently and took a look swig, then another, ignoring how the liquid burned all the way down my throat and inside my gut."). I thought the style didn't quite feel like a teenager all the time, but it wasn't bad in that regard. There were a few good lines; my favorite was, in regards to a character with severe respiratory problems, "He still sounded like a sick seal..."
Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. This one's hard. I felt like the overall historical place-setting was very good--to me, it felt more real than most historical romances I've read. (Even though it's not always a romantic setting...chamber pots are referenced more than once.)
On the other hand, these people in medieval Italy discovered Gabi coming out of a tomb, in clothing more revealing than undergarments, and she's spirited, has little respect for her social "betters", and even insists on wielding a sword. And they like and even love her for it! It's an interesting conceit, but the fact that Gabi can fight off bad guys with a sword, in addition to her many other talents, felt like a bit much to me.
Conveniently, she is able to speak/pick up medieval Italian--if I recall correctly, she picked up some Italian from her parents' archaeological vacations. I don't find it exactly plausible that she could speak to these people as easily as she did--though there were some slip-ups. But it is tricky to get people in other worlds to be able to talk to each other, so I'm okay with it. Then again, she also knows some Latin and French, which puts her well ahead of the curve for most Americans...
Positive: 3 out of 5. While the ending left certain things unresolved, everything ended as well as could be expected. I have to ding it a little on "positive" due to the substantial threats of torture, occasional actual torture, and lines like:
But he was untying his trousers. He did not intend to kill me.I wish Bergren would have added a word: "He did not only intend to kill me." Then it would have avoided the cliche that to a woman, being raped is (supposedly) even worse than being killed.
He had darker intentions still.
Gut reaction: 4 out of 5. I'm not the target audience, and I hate to say I'm not even that interested in whether or not Gabi and Marcello get together. But Gabi's sister Lia and the knight who likes her, Luca, are likable enough, and the ideas interesting enough, I have some interest in reading some more.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of slightly mushy young-adult time-travel fiction.
Total Rating: 3.6 out of 5 stars
*I downloaded this book for free, I believe on Amazon.
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
The Shadow Lamp by Stephen R. Lawhead - Review - CSFF Blog Tour
Julie again for the CSFF Blog Tour! Yes, I made it through The Shadow Lamp in time to get a review out! The remaining 100 pages or so moved much better for me, except...well, we'll get into that.
Book: The Shadow Lamp by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook)
Ridiculously simplified summary: Fourth in a series. A group of adventurers seeks to use magical ley lines--portals between times, places, and dimensions--to prevent the world's destruction.
Content: To shamelessly steal from Rebecca LuElla Miller, "Of the four Bright Empires books I’ve read, this is the only one that has what I consider didactic sections. Interestingly the “preachiness” has less to do with God than it does science."
That said there is some reference to Christianity at last here...including some ideas about God and Jesus that, unless I am misunderstanding, seem to me to be rather controversial for a Christian book. Thomas Fletcher Booher both articulated my concerns better than I could have, and took the issues seriously enough that it reassures me that my concerns are valid.
There is some violence, but nothing that overly disturbed me. (Though I haven't yet tried sleeping after reading the brunt of the violence, so...)
Rating:
Compelling: 6 out of 10. This book didn't grab my interest like the earlier ones did, but as I mentioned yesterday, that could be because of it being less of a mystery. That said, still I felt like there was a lack of action overall for the first big chunk of the book. Things picked up for me about midway through, and there were some really good dramatic scenes closer to the end, though I thought parts of the end also felt almost rushed, after the slower pace of the beginning. Or maybe it's the fact that it's only in the last 100 pages or so of the 4th book in a 5-book series that the main problem is actually revealed. Book 5 should be pretty darned interesting, dealing with all that.
Characters: 8 out of 10. For the most part, the characters were the same as they'd been in the previous books, with plenty of spunky women and sweet, chivalrous men, which is a combination I find hard to turn down. I almost feel like there's a little coasting on the goodwill established in previous books, but that's probably because there are a lot of events that have to transpire in this book and the characters are established, not any actual flaws.
Writing/editing: 6 out of 10. There were some excellent and elegant descriptions, and some nice lines, such as "with the calm acceptance of the condemned who at last understand that time is short and life fleeting and that nothing matters except that which is eternal." The dialogue tags again drove me completely batty during long strings of dialogue. Over the span of two pages are both "'Fair enough,' allowed Kit" and "'Partly,' allowed Kit." I realize that's Lawhead's style in this series--he's been nothing if not consistent in using them through all these books! But during parts when the action isn't rolling along, I get completely derailed by these kinds of tags.
Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. I felt like the science became less plausible here--I have trouble with the scientific insistence that (minor spoiler) if the universe isn't expanding as quickly as it always did, that it definitely must be doomed to contract into nothingness.
Positive: 3 out of 5. This one is darker than books 2 and 3, I thought.
Of course, these are all speculation by scientists that could very well prove to be wrong. The epilogue was an incredible way to show Christian love.
Gut reaction: 4 out of 5. I'd call the ending a twist ending. (Though to me, the descriptions at the end read almost like literary fiction, describing a scene in incredible detail with a deeper meaning--they reminded me of my English classes in college, which I didn't enjoy.) The epilogue helped salvage any lingering ill will overall.
At any rate, I'm looking forward to reading the end of the series for sure. I'm just hoping that book starts quicker than this one.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of Christian science fantasy that doesn't mind point of view shifts.
Total Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
Here are the tour participants!
Julie Bihn
Red Bissell
Thomas Clayton Booher
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
Theresa Dunlap
April Erwin
Timothy Hicks
Christopher Hopper
Becky Jesse
Becca Johnson
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Mirriam Neal
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Rachel Wyant
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Book: The Shadow Lamp by Stephen R. Lawhead (Facebook) Ridiculously simplified summary: Fourth in a series. A group of adventurers seeks to use magical ley lines--portals between times, places, and dimensions--to prevent the world's destruction.
Content: To shamelessly steal from Rebecca LuElla Miller, "Of the four Bright Empires books I’ve read, this is the only one that has what I consider didactic sections. Interestingly the “preachiness” has less to do with God than it does science."
That said there is some reference to Christianity at last here...including some ideas about God and Jesus that, unless I am misunderstanding, seem to me to be rather controversial for a Christian book. Thomas Fletcher Booher both articulated my concerns better than I could have, and took the issues seriously enough that it reassures me that my concerns are valid.
There is some violence, but nothing that overly disturbed me. (Though I haven't yet tried sleeping after reading the brunt of the violence, so...)
Rating:
Compelling: 6 out of 10. This book didn't grab my interest like the earlier ones did, but as I mentioned yesterday, that could be because of it being less of a mystery. That said, still I felt like there was a lack of action overall for the first big chunk of the book. Things picked up for me about midway through, and there were some really good dramatic scenes closer to the end, though I thought parts of the end also felt almost rushed, after the slower pace of the beginning. Or maybe it's the fact that it's only in the last 100 pages or so of the 4th book in a 5-book series that the main problem is actually revealed. Book 5 should be pretty darned interesting, dealing with all that.
Characters: 8 out of 10. For the most part, the characters were the same as they'd been in the previous books, with plenty of spunky women and sweet, chivalrous men, which is a combination I find hard to turn down. I almost feel like there's a little coasting on the goodwill established in previous books, but that's probably because there are a lot of events that have to transpire in this book and the characters are established, not any actual flaws.
Writing/editing: 6 out of 10. There were some excellent and elegant descriptions, and some nice lines, such as "with the calm acceptance of the condemned who at last understand that time is short and life fleeting and that nothing matters except that which is eternal." The dialogue tags again drove me completely batty during long strings of dialogue. Over the span of two pages are both "'Fair enough,' allowed Kit" and "'Partly,' allowed Kit." I realize that's Lawhead's style in this series--he's been nothing if not consistent in using them through all these books! But during parts when the action isn't rolling along, I get completely derailed by these kinds of tags.
Plausibility/believability: 3 out of 5. I felt like the science became less plausible here--I have trouble with the scientific insistence that (minor spoiler) if the universe isn't expanding as quickly as it always did, that it definitely must be doomed to contract into nothingness.
Positive: 3 out of 5. This one is darker than books 2 and 3, I thought.
I found the implications about Christianity rather disturbing, particularly the possible implication about Jesus' relation to the Spirit Well (which isn't certainly wrong) and even worse, the idea that anything humans could do could undo all of God's creation.
Of course, these are all speculation by scientists that could very well prove to be wrong. The epilogue was an incredible way to show Christian love.
Gut reaction: 4 out of 5. I'd call the ending a twist ending. (Though to me, the descriptions at the end read almost like literary fiction, describing a scene in incredible detail with a deeper meaning--they reminded me of my English classes in college, which I didn't enjoy.) The epilogue helped salvage any lingering ill will overall.
At any rate, I'm looking forward to reading the end of the series for sure. I'm just hoping that book starts quicker than this one.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of Christian science fantasy that doesn't mind point of view shifts.
Total Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
Here are the tour participants!
Julie Bihn
Red Bissell
Thomas Clayton Booher
Thomas Fletcher Booher
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Karri Compton
Theresa Dunlap
April Erwin
Timothy Hicks
Christopher Hopper
Becky Jesse
Becca Johnson
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Rebekah Loper
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Mirriam Neal
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Rachel Starr Thomson
Robert Treskillard
Steve Trower
Rachel Wyant
Phyllis Wheeler
Deborah Wilson
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
CSFF Blog Tour - The Hero's Lot by Patrick W. Carr - Review
Julie once more for the CSFF Blog Tour!
Book: The Hero's Lot by Patrick W. Carr
Ridiculously simplified summary: Second in a series. The kingdom of Erinon, perhaps the whole world, is in grave danger. When the king dies, the kingdom's protection will expire as well, plunging the kingdom into chaos and war.
Martin the priest and his companions, nearly caught using predictive lots for forbidden purposes, have to flee the conclave to avoid discovery. While on the run, Martin discovers that the "unknowable" force Aurae is in fact knowable.
Meanwhile, town drunk-turned-warrior and reader of the future, Errol, is unfairly accused. He is compelled, condemned to journey to a far-off kingdom to kill the near-invincible Sarin Valon.
Content: This book shows its Evangelical colors, with a new group of (basically) Christians who follow the call of Aurae (the Holy Spirit) instead of the doctrines of the Church. Casting lots is not outright condemned, but Aurae is greater. (It was interesting to see such a heavy focus on the Holy Spirit...more than I recall seeing in any other novel I've read lately.)
There is quite a bit of violence in this one, including multiple beheadings, puddles of blood, and so forth--I got a bit nauseated at parts.
Rating:
Compelling: 7 out of 10. If you read my review of A Cast of Stones (Book 1 in the series), you probably realized I'm not a fan of epic fantasy.
I actually enjoyed several portions of this book, but I found it tricky to rate, given the multiple storylines. I had some interest in Errol's exploits even early on (and much moreso later). But since I have no interest in the church arc and politics, I had almost no interest in Martin's thread until the very end of it (more on him later).
The last hundred pages or so got more interesting to me, though. Unlike A Cast of Stones, I thought this book built to a logical and satisfying conflict. As it's a trilogy, of course things weren't resolved by the end, but I felt it was structured better than the first book.
Characters: 4 out of 10. Many of the characters from A Cast of Stones are back in this one. Aside from Naaman Ru and Adora, I don't like any of the returning characters here more than I liked them in A Cast of Stones; in fact, I found Rohka less likable, bordering on unbalanced. There are a few new characters which, on the balance, I found about as likable as the ones we left behind in Book 1. Errol is still a good character, although he goes catatonic for a pretty long stretch. (That's not unrealistic, but I have no patience for characters who do that in any book; I want to read about people moving on, not moping.) I still strongly dislike the priests, and in particular Martin.
Unfortunately for me, many pages of this novel are from Martin's point of view, and the scenes did little to endear him to me. His story arc features him thinking he's not good enough (instead of being too physically weak and drunk, like Errol, he considers himself too physically weak and fat). Despite the shortcomings for which Martin despises himself, he is Chosen for some sort of greatness. If you like Martin, you might think that is a fun parallel to Errol's arc, granted.
Writing/editing: 4 out of 10. I thought the writing style in this was worse than in A Cast of Stones, or maybe I just noticed problems more.
First, there are many scenes from Martin's point of view, and I was expecting at least a subtle change in the character's thought processes and narrative style to match who he was. Instead, I felt like Martin's scenes were written in an identical style to Errol's. So instead of any quirks of the style being due to getting into Errol's head, I now see the style was simply the author's own style, since an older priest and a young man think the same way. I think there was a real missed opportunity here--seeing two substantially different voices would have been compelling.
The fight scenes are full of action verbs, but I think that causes some odd phrasings. For instance, on page 101, (crossbow) "Bolts sprouted from the flesh of the bowmen like quills" and then 4 paragraphs later, an arrow "sprouted in a man's throat." Since things that sprout come from beneath the surface, I thought "sprouted" was an odd term to use for objects that are likely penetrating, at least as far as Errol can see. And to see this unusual phrasing twice in such close succession distracted me. Every author has some of these words that they use more often than an editor might expect (I could've sworn my co-author and I had a blog entry where we listed ours, but I can't find it--"just" and "back" were two of our simple ones). In a perfect world, I imagine an editor would go through and ensure overused and notable words are used carefully.
I hadn't been distracted by the "telling" in A Cast of Stones--if every emotion and thought were "shown" it probably would have been an extra 200 pages long! But in The Hero's Lot I thought some of these "telling" instances should have been expanded to draw the reader in. On page 397, to describe what Errol thought may have happened to someone he cares about, it simply says "Errol's imagination conjured images that disturbed him. The tenor of his heartbeat increased until it pounded against his ribs." For myself, I'm not feeling his anguish--I feel like I'm being told he had some bad thoughts that made his heart pound.
I actually enjoyed the ending and some other parts of the book, but this enjoyment was due to the plot. The writing isn't terrible by any means, but I think another round of editing could have made the story shine.
Plausibility/believability: 2 out of 5. I have many of the same concerns I had from A Cast of Stones, but there are fewer of the weaponry details I enjoyed so much in Book 1, though I thought I "saw" the new places visited better. I did think it was rather strange and convenient that numerous people were forced into doing what the plot required by being compelled by the church...if not for compulsion, one character may not have appeared in this book at all.
Positive: 3 out of 5. Things aren't going great at the end of this book, but Christianity finally makes an appearance here. I think most of this book is darker than A Cast of Stones (which was pretty dark itself!) but this one ends happier so I found it less depressing.
Gut reaction: 3 out of 5. The more optimistic ending gave me a better feeling about the end of this book. I actually got more interested as the book progressed (provided we weren't following Martin!).
But the treatment of women drove me absolutely up the wall. On page 341, a woman in a city's council expresses interest in Martin the priest (during a meeting!), then kisses him on the lips and says if he tires of the priesthood, he "would make a fine husband." (While there were other women in the council, the one who wasn't eying the priest like a catch doesn't even get a name, as far as I can see.)
Two pages later, a ship captain talks to his wife or lover and "swatted her on the rump." Seriously?!
Adora and Rokha are all right, in fairness, but I still get the feeling that women are just there to be love interests and daughters, not generally valued in their own right.
Then again, this is a plot-heavy book; few of the plot points occur due to the purposeful actions of any of the heroes, male or female. In fact, one could probably argue that Adora is one of the few characters who chooses multiple courses of action for herself, instead of being outright forced into it by others. She might truly come into her own in the final book.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of Christian epic fantasy.
Total Rating: 2.8 out of 5 stars
Here are the tour participants!
Julie Bihn
Jennifer Bogart
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Laure Covert
Pauline Creeden
Emma or Audrey Engel
April Erwin
Nikole Hahn
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Krystine Kercher
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Rachel Wyant
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Book: The Hero's Lot by Patrick W. Carr
Ridiculously simplified summary: Second in a series. The kingdom of Erinon, perhaps the whole world, is in grave danger. When the king dies, the kingdom's protection will expire as well, plunging the kingdom into chaos and war.
Martin the priest and his companions, nearly caught using predictive lots for forbidden purposes, have to flee the conclave to avoid discovery. While on the run, Martin discovers that the "unknowable" force Aurae is in fact knowable.
Meanwhile, town drunk-turned-warrior and reader of the future, Errol, is unfairly accused. He is compelled, condemned to journey to a far-off kingdom to kill the near-invincible Sarin Valon.
Content: This book shows its Evangelical colors, with a new group of (basically) Christians who follow the call of Aurae (the Holy Spirit) instead of the doctrines of the Church. Casting lots is not outright condemned, but Aurae is greater. (It was interesting to see such a heavy focus on the Holy Spirit...more than I recall seeing in any other novel I've read lately.)
There is quite a bit of violence in this one, including multiple beheadings, puddles of blood, and so forth--I got a bit nauseated at parts.
Rating:
Compelling: 7 out of 10. If you read my review of A Cast of Stones (Book 1 in the series), you probably realized I'm not a fan of epic fantasy.
I actually enjoyed several portions of this book, but I found it tricky to rate, given the multiple storylines. I had some interest in Errol's exploits even early on (and much moreso later). But since I have no interest in the church arc and politics, I had almost no interest in Martin's thread until the very end of it (more on him later).
The last hundred pages or so got more interesting to me, though. Unlike A Cast of Stones, I thought this book built to a logical and satisfying conflict. As it's a trilogy, of course things weren't resolved by the end, but I felt it was structured better than the first book.
Characters: 4 out of 10. Many of the characters from A Cast of Stones are back in this one. Aside from Naaman Ru and Adora, I don't like any of the returning characters here more than I liked them in A Cast of Stones; in fact, I found Rohka less likable, bordering on unbalanced. There are a few new characters which, on the balance, I found about as likable as the ones we left behind in Book 1. Errol is still a good character, although he goes catatonic for a pretty long stretch. (That's not unrealistic, but I have no patience for characters who do that in any book; I want to read about people moving on, not moping.) I still strongly dislike the priests, and in particular Martin.
Unfortunately for me, many pages of this novel are from Martin's point of view, and the scenes did little to endear him to me. His story arc features him thinking he's not good enough (instead of being too physically weak and drunk, like Errol, he considers himself too physically weak and fat). Despite the shortcomings for which Martin despises himself, he is Chosen for some sort of greatness. If you like Martin, you might think that is a fun parallel to Errol's arc, granted.
Writing/editing: 4 out of 10. I thought the writing style in this was worse than in A Cast of Stones, or maybe I just noticed problems more.
First, there are many scenes from Martin's point of view, and I was expecting at least a subtle change in the character's thought processes and narrative style to match who he was. Instead, I felt like Martin's scenes were written in an identical style to Errol's. So instead of any quirks of the style being due to getting into Errol's head, I now see the style was simply the author's own style, since an older priest and a young man think the same way. I think there was a real missed opportunity here--seeing two substantially different voices would have been compelling.
The fight scenes are full of action verbs, but I think that causes some odd phrasings. For instance, on page 101, (crossbow) "Bolts sprouted from the flesh of the bowmen like quills" and then 4 paragraphs later, an arrow "sprouted in a man's throat." Since things that sprout come from beneath the surface, I thought "sprouted" was an odd term to use for objects that are likely penetrating, at least as far as Errol can see. And to see this unusual phrasing twice in such close succession distracted me. Every author has some of these words that they use more often than an editor might expect (I could've sworn my co-author and I had a blog entry where we listed ours, but I can't find it--"just" and "back" were two of our simple ones). In a perfect world, I imagine an editor would go through and ensure overused and notable words are used carefully.
I hadn't been distracted by the "telling" in A Cast of Stones--if every emotion and thought were "shown" it probably would have been an extra 200 pages long! But in The Hero's Lot I thought some of these "telling" instances should have been expanded to draw the reader in. On page 397, to describe what Errol thought may have happened to someone he cares about, it simply says "Errol's imagination conjured images that disturbed him. The tenor of his heartbeat increased until it pounded against his ribs." For myself, I'm not feeling his anguish--I feel like I'm being told he had some bad thoughts that made his heart pound.
I actually enjoyed the ending and some other parts of the book, but this enjoyment was due to the plot. The writing isn't terrible by any means, but I think another round of editing could have made the story shine.
Plausibility/believability: 2 out of 5. I have many of the same concerns I had from A Cast of Stones, but there are fewer of the weaponry details I enjoyed so much in Book 1, though I thought I "saw" the new places visited better. I did think it was rather strange and convenient that numerous people were forced into doing what the plot required by being compelled by the church...if not for compulsion, one character may not have appeared in this book at all.
Positive: 3 out of 5. Things aren't going great at the end of this book, but Christianity finally makes an appearance here. I think most of this book is darker than A Cast of Stones (which was pretty dark itself!) but this one ends happier so I found it less depressing.
Gut reaction: 3 out of 5. The more optimistic ending gave me a better feeling about the end of this book. I actually got more interested as the book progressed (provided we weren't following Martin!).
But the treatment of women drove me absolutely up the wall. On page 341, a woman in a city's council expresses interest in Martin the priest (during a meeting!), then kisses him on the lips and says if he tires of the priesthood, he "would make a fine husband." (While there were other women in the council, the one who wasn't eying the priest like a catch doesn't even get a name, as far as I can see.)
Two pages later, a ship captain talks to his wife or lover and "swatted her on the rump." Seriously?!
Adora and Rokha are all right, in fairness, but I still get the feeling that women are just there to be love interests and daughters, not generally valued in their own right.
Then again, this is a plot-heavy book; few of the plot points occur due to the purposeful actions of any of the heroes, male or female. In fact, one could probably argue that Adora is one of the few characters who chooses multiple courses of action for herself, instead of being outright forced into it by others. She might truly come into her own in the final book.
Bonus points: 5 out of 5.
Recommended for: Fans of Christian epic fantasy.
Total Rating: 2.8 out of 5 stars
Here are the tour participants!
Julie Bihn
Jennifer Bogart
Keanan Brand
Beckie Burnham
Jeff Chapman
Laure Covert
Pauline Creeden
Emma or Audrey Engel
April Erwin
Nikole Hahn
Jason Joyner
Carol Keen
Krystine Kercher
Shannon McDermott
Meagan @ Blooming with Books
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Writer Rani
Nathan Reimer
Chawna Schroeder
Jojo Sutis
Steve Trower
Phyllis Wheeler
Rachel Wyant
*In conjunction with the CSFF Blog Tour, I received a free copy of this book.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










